anjc

23 ms·

211.
by anjc 7y ago
Same here. Jim Carrey's face seems to morph into John Wayne's and James Dean's when he does impressions of them. I thought the same was happening with Bill. I'm aware of deepfakes but yet it took several watches with me
212.
by anjc 7y ago
Is the functionality of your app already included in the Health app? If not, take a guess what feature will be soon included in the Health app. Apple have a history of killing competitors in the App Store, most recently with screen time app
213.
by anjc 7y ago
> They don’t need to be viewed after they’ve been identified. Says who? Do you have information about the grieving process being easier if you don't view?
214.
by anjc 7y ago
Why are people ITT talking about reducing problems to SAT? As I understand it, the point of reducing a problem to SAT is because there's a proof that SAT is NP-Complete which in turn would prove that your problem is NP-Complete. But if
215.
by anjc 7y ago
Is meta-learning still useful for SAT solving (e.g SATzilla)?
216.
by anjc 7y ago
Access to water in Ireland is assumed to such an extent that it isn't even listed in the ESRI's criteria for poverty. As such, it's very obvious that lack of bathing/changing clothes will almost NEVER be due to lack of a
217.
by anjc 8y ago
Who's like us!
218.
by anjc 8y ago
> On the other hand, assuming the Post article’s mention of an “algorithm” is meant to refer to CHIRP, it is in error, since CHIRP was not used to create the current images. Yeah? You wouldn't find this confusing as a lay person? Ma
219.
by anjc 8y ago
My mistake, it was in the other article I linked to. Her current/future employers, her colleagues, and every academic's employers and colleagues, want to know contributions. Some fields make you explicitly list them for each paper
220.
by anjc 8y ago
I'm confused about this. People said her code contribution on the repo was minimal. Others in the field came out and said "yes but her algorithm was key here, not lines of code". Fine. Her own statement then says that "n
221.
by anjc 8y ago
> This is a shining example of old web content we've lost in the current era of walled gardens and social graphs. Five AMAZING geek social fallacies you never learned in school. You wont believe number 4!
222.
by anjc 8y ago
> But I looked, and could only find her expressing concerns about restrooms and sports teams. > If that's not "openly hostile to trans people" I don't know what is ... There's room for reasonable discussion on
223.
by anjc 8y ago
Thanks for reply. Regarding alpha value: you seem to say that with a small sample size, it'd be possible to see no effect between groups. I think you were implying that they should've been testing p<0.0001 or something? But I&#
224.
by anjc 8y ago
Ah thanks, I understand this aspect. As I say, they simply failed to rejected the null hypothesis, and their approach here seems perfectly valid. The authors did overreach in their interpretation of the result. But OP said ANOVA is wrong, a
225.
by anjc 8y ago
Can you explain this common mistake further? > They're claiming there is no difference between groups because they were unable to show that, if there was an inherent difference, the chance they'd see these results is at most 5%
226.
by anjc 8y ago
Unreadable and bizarre article. Congrats to the author on rubbing shoulders with the hoi polloi and getting a...train.
227.
by anjc 8y ago
> I don't want to put words in their mouth, but I think it might be a bundle vs a la carte argument. For issues that tend towards short term treatments (eg a handful of antibiotic pills to mitigate the risk of wound infection) then
228.
by anjc 8y ago
Am I missing something: >A study just published in The New England Journal of Medicine found that on average, Australia pays $7,352 (U.S.) per course of treatment. It has been able to treat seven times as many patients as it would withou
229.
by anjc 8y ago
I can't see if it's an emulator or uses a real z80 etc. Looks cool though
230.
by anjc 8y ago
Between people losing their keyphrase, to software wallets being hacked, to hardware wallets being compromised...at what point is it more safe to just keep your coins on a reputable, insured, exchange? I think the odds of Coinbase doing a M
231.
by anjc 8y ago
This must be a route-dependent thing (e.g. Sandymount routes would have lots of students on them). My routes rarely/ever have trash or liquids on them, hit branches etc. Again re: seats and engine....these are the same seats and engine
232.
by anjc 8y ago
> There's buses. They're ugly, loud and extremely uncomfortable Ireland didn't invent these buses just to annoy you, the Volvo buses used in Dublin are used worldwide, including London and Berlin. They're as modern as
233.
by anjc 8y ago
It's obvious that these people are not stupid and understand that interfaces need to be documented. They are instead confused. I've had micromanagers like SW before, and have been confused many times at the state of something prec
234.
by anjc 8y ago
Any arguments like this are immediately nullified because we have real-world examples of blockchain doing astounding things which can't be done without it. E.g. cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. Can you transfer value across the world
235.
by anjc 8y ago
It's interesting how, aside from a few infrequent and slight glitches, the artificial faces look perfect, but yet we still intuitively know which one is real based on lots of other cues (the background, the pose etc).
236.
by anjc 8y ago
> If there were significant negative side effects of vaccines - of an order which negates the benefits of those vaccinations - I would argue that we'd know that by now. New vaccines are created and may have side effects. E.g. H1N1 v
237.
by anjc 8y ago
> saying "X is good/bad" 3 times as a persuasive argument I didn't say that it's a persuasive argument, I said that it can be persuasive IN arguments. There's nothing sad about an AI learning it, or people b
238.
by anjc 8y ago
The parts you criticise are the parts I was most impressed with. These sorts of repetitions can be persuasive in writing/arguments, and it's impressive to me that a model learned this type of writing.
239.
by anjc 8y ago
If you've faked your data to get these results then it could mean the end of your career, hence must be a very uncommon practice. This is a different from cherrypicking data, or putting a positive spin on your findings. But again, it&#
240.
by anjc 8y ago
Luckily the academic system will typically weed out unethical behaviour (e.g. faking results).

More ›