Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anjc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
Brilliant video
32.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
If you were to post on another public website "My name is X, and my Reddit username is Y", would your anonymous Reddit posts now be considered personal data? I suppose this would constitute indirect identification of a data subjec
33.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
This is long solved
34.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
> I cannot understand how they think “being actice and doing things” is their selling point? It is just so unintuitive. For me it's the best aspect of VR, a complete gamechanger. Maybe this is unintuitive from a non-user's poin
35.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
> " By contrast, every demo that they showed was a person sitting on a couch by themself." > Wait, I thought an Oculus does the same thing too. I never use my Quest sitting down. I use it as a roomscale device for, e.g., box
36.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
> Even if that's the case, their paper should probably be more specific to the chemistry domain. Why?
37.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
> The authors of the study are all from the chemistry department at the University of Kansas. Is this really the sort of paper they should be authoring? What are you saying here?
38.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
Maybe I misunderstood but it seemed that he learned it was your fault, rather than this being an opinion he formed.
39.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
Are you going to raise this with the school? It seems highly inappropriate on their part
40.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
Brilliant and lovely, well done. I think the applicability of techniques go both ways. Similar to what Sarah's dad said, I see research in ML now which rehashes expertise from many decades ago. Conversely, I see the demoscene implement
41.
▲
by
anjc
3y ago
Many comments are focussed on how this will affect models in deployment, but a more troubling implication for me is that evaluations and comparisons across models using past data are affected by this.
42.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
The article mentions something important and doesn't elaborate, that is, to trust the scientific method. I've seen a few times state of the art developments that appeared to upend everything in my field. Only then with the passage
43.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
The approach you suggest is very common in the public sector, almost to a rule. Public services are just massive, costly, complicated, and cater to all sorts of vulnerable populations, and the public have pay for it. The time horizon on som
44.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
Did you look at it? It summarises per-paragraph and the correctness can largely be verified by a layperson.
45.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
> the next time you have trouble booking a surgeon or even a gastroenterologist, you can remember that America’s supply of surgeons and gastroenterologists is being disproportionately used by the AARP crowd. What a horrible sentiment.
46.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
Why are so many low magnitude stars in this image, not shrouded by gas, not visible at all in the previous image? Surely some visible light must be emitted by these?
47.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
> The lottery is an accepted tax on math morons, as my old teacher liked to say. This glib old chestnut falls apart when you ask the "math savvy" what the probability of winning is when a person buys more than 1 ticket. Probabi
48.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
That's essentially what lottery/prize/premium bonds are, albeit they're optional https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lottery_bond
49.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
I presumed OP was talking about winders and so on. If shims were used for critical elements like optical alignment, I'm guessing that it's because this was the cheaper route to precision, rather than due to an inability to measure
50.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
> Modern people overestimate how long we have been able to engineer things precisely I think you're underestimating it also. For example, micrometres capable of measuring imperceptible differences have existed for many centuries, sa
51.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
It's state of the art. It sounds amazing compared to anything that's existed before. What alternative are you comparing this to to say that it's awful?
52.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
That's the perfect use-case for PHEV
53.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
If someone can't say "got a minute to chat?" or even "hello" to you without causing anxiety, you need a long break, a new job, or professional help. Surprised at all the comments agreeing with this article.
54.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
Not technical writing, but the best book I've ever read on writing (including Elements of Style etc.) is "Getting Published in International Journals: Writing Strategies for European Social Scientists". On the surface it'
55.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
> I attribute the 'magic' to large scale statistical knowledge assimilation by the models - and reproduction to prompts which closely match the inputs' sentence embedding. In effect this is how humans respond to prompts no
56.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
> It's 1T worth of... what? US dollars
57.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
Great concept. I'm not doing so well though :) Seems like a good way to internalise notation
58.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
Grandmaster moves are likely more optimal than any guesses an average person will make
59.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
Can you show the distribution of reading speeds. If this font has a multimodal effect then the t-test mightn't be appropriate.
60.
▲
by
anjc
4y ago
Same where I am. If you have a dSLR even a 15 second exposure will show you Andromeda with light pollution. Time consuming hobby though :)
More ›