aniro

13 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by aniro 14y ago

   My point was not to equate the murderous behavior. I see that you might find such a comparison distressing. Facebook is circling the wagons on its user base. I see no one this benefits other than Facebook itself. While promoting effortless
2. 92.▲
   by aniro 14y ago

   The Manson Family. Note that "family". A controlling psychopath or cult requires cutting off access to outside resources, preempting a possible escape path. No different.
3. 93.▲
   by aniro 15y ago

   I cant wait until someone integrates this with their dating site. Though for clarity we may need a HAD button as well.
4. 94.▲
   by aniro 15y ago

   You are welcome to do with your privacy whatever you damn well please. It is yours. When someone else decides what to do with it without bothering to ask for permission, it is called an "invasion of privacy." For many people this is a bad t
5. 95.▲
   by aniro 15y ago

   This is a patently absurd notion. I haven't heard an assertion so patently foolish and I'll considered since the Path CEO claimed that uploading every users "little black book" onto the Path servers without permission or notification was an
6. 96.▲
   by aniro 15y ago

   response from a friend of mine: "I would like to be able to run an antivirus style application on FB that identifies relationships that are a threat to my credit profile, career prospects, and caste. I want to know who to ditch."