anileated

9 ms·

61.
by anileated 1y ago
I think it is safe to assume that more generous (for them) interpretation is the one that will be used by any big company. My link: > You grant us and our legal successors the right to store, archive, parse, and display Your Content, and
62.
by anileated 1y ago
The link you posted is not ToS. https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-t... (The link I posted is also not the proper ToS, it is more of an abridged version. They made the actual ToS somew
63.
by anileated 1y ago
A law in a world where laws are updated when technologies evolve, and judicial system doesn’t just serve those with the most money?
64.
by anileated 1y ago
IP theft involves deprivation of the holder of ownership claim. Observing a game before making your own game, listening to music before releasing your own track, viewing photos before making a go at the same composition, do not do that. Cla
65.
by anileated 1y ago
Theft of IP permanently deprives the author of ownership claim. It’s quite a problem if you want people to innovate or create new stuff, because they usually do this with an expectation to be able to claim ownership and have a healthy degre
66.
by anileated 1y ago
Check ToS.
67.
by anileated 1y ago
Unlimited generation of derivative works is not fair use.
68.
by anileated 1y ago
Security audits are just theater. If they were not, you could not ever convince them that using a platform feeding unlicensed source (including apparently from private repositories) to their commercial LLM is ever a pass.
69.
by anileated 1y ago
The difference between a currency and store of value is not an exact line, but however vague that line is it is somewhat clear on which side Bitcoin is, and it is not the currency side.
70.
by anileated 1y ago
Fallback email = a vector to lose your domain.
71.
by anileated 1y ago
That is not what they wrote, but what you describe sure sounds like an interesting design that I don't recall in countries other than Japan.
72.
by anileated 1y ago
Turns out, I am intimately familiar with this service plan. There are metro trains with more frequent stops and service and there are distance trains with rarer stops (and yes, rarer service, the degree of which varies by country). What is
73.
by anileated 1y ago
My comment said: > > What's kinda interesting is does that train classify as metro transit that goes slightly beyond city to airport and such (making many stops all the way) or distance intercity train that happens to stop both a
74.
by anileated 1y ago
Apparently in the US there are trains that use dual rail and overhead power, one for subway and another for overground portions. I suppose a subway train with rail only supply that goes overground sometimes is more dangerous because it is e
75.
by anileated 1y ago
Yes. Subway train that goes over ground is just train. Metro or long distance is an actual distinction. If they blend in Japan then that's rare.
76.
by anileated 1y ago
> a train from the airport, which then turns into a subway, then later on it becomes a train again. This is confusing. Subway is already a kind of train. You mean to say that the train partly runs underground? That is pretty common. I ac
77.
by anileated 1y ago
> always use your own domain so if your email service locks you out, you can move to another instantly. What to do if your domain is taken away legally (e.g. via trademark dispute) or due to a random combination of unlucky factors is bou
78.
by anileated 1y ago
> This is why I think it's just a more powerful version of "standard CGI" It is a subset of CGI, a special case. I have never seen the term “standard CGI”, there is no standard. > Many AI art creators use tools Any so
79.
by anileated 1y ago
On a technical level, DTGI (diffusion-transformer generated imagery) is a subset of CGI (computer generated imagery). All DTGI is also CGI. Computer is the medium, like painting on a canvas. You can paint, or you can pay someone to paint fo
80.
by anileated 2y ago
There are many cases where laws that are made for humans before certain tech are not sufficient once certain tech arrives. You don’t need the right to be forgotten outside of specific tech because human brain forgets by default, paper rots,
81.
by anileated 2y ago
> The entire legal edifice around recognizing and protecting intellectual property is an entirely artificial construct The presence of “natural” vs. “artificial” argument is a placeholder for nonexistent substantiation. There is never a
82.
by anileated 2y ago
The fact that works are produced not by a human, not for private use, but by a for-profit tool commercially at scale is important. > if OpenAI was downloading pirated copies of the Ghibli corpus then that act itself was copyright infring
83.
by anileated 2y ago
Given an octopus[0] is worse at mimicking human output than an LLM, either you decide that the LLM has surpassed the octopus in thought capability and should enjoy higher protections against abuse and violence, or you decide that thought is
84.
by anileated 2y ago
Since you cannot (it is technically not possible) create an ML model reproducing a style without having it ingest original works in that style, and such a tool is producing derivative works based on original work (let’s say, by Miyazaki o
85.
by anileated 2y ago
The problem with LLMs is techbro crowd trying to pretend they are like thinking humans (all these analogies with us memorizing things) when it comes to rights like access to information and copyright abuse, but not thinking humans when it c
86.
by anileated 2y ago
The ideas of FTL travel or existence of bearded people in the sky were also explored for a long time. > as an echo of the past when people had the same debate about women and non-Europeans. If you need help spotting the difference betwee
87.
by anileated 2y ago
> If we could incrementally update our own brains by swapping cells for chips, what percentage of our brain has to be chips before us learning from a book is a violation of copyright? The same percentage at which you stop qualifying to b
88.
by anileated 2y ago
> Do people really think a web server written in Go or Rust is unmaintainable? Things are not black and white. It will be less maintainable relatively speaking, proper tool for the job and all that. That’s why you will be left in the d
89.
by anileated 2y ago
Again, your competitor will get there faster and with fewer bugs. LLMs are trained on human input and humans do not do great at low level languages. They churn out better Python than C and especially when it comes to refactoring it (have ob
90.
by anileated 2y ago
> Given LLM assistance, why wouldn't I write my web app layer in Rust or Zig? Same reasons as with no LLM assistance. You would be choosing higher maintenance burden and slower development speed compared to your competitors, though.

More ›