Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anhner
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
151.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
At least you understood my comment.
152.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
I think you have misread my comment. A regular toothbrush + toothpaste costs pennies a day, add floss and mouthwash and it would still not reach $20/month. If I can take care of my teeth by using all of those costing so little, what on
153.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
But I don't need a mechanical keyboard when a standard cheap one works just as fine. What would I possibly gain from paying more?
154.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
Any source for those made-up-sounding numbers?
155.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
No, just the phone. I use the call/text/data plant so little since I'm mostly on wifi anyway, so I left that out.
156.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
I agree, it's stupid to pay $20 for something you can get for 2 cents
157.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
People are also delusional
158.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
I use my toothbrush every day but I wouldn't pay $20 per month for it. I use my keyboard everyday but I wouldn't pay $20 per month for it. In fact, I paid around $4 total for it, as paying more would bring significantly more dimin
159.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
1. Create AI capable of writing almost human-level text and make it generally available. 2. Make said AI generate text in a way that makes it possible to detect that it was written by a machine. 3. Create another AI that detects text writte
160.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
I guarantee you children in (european) urban areas go out more because there are more children and places to play with. In suburban hell what are you supposed to play with? And with whom? The only other two kids on the street?
161.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
You say it's like a science, do you have any resources that have helped you in that direction, or do you mean in the sense that you experimented and saw what worked?
162.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
so you say it's full of crap, and the solution is for them to allow even more, even crappier crap?
163.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
That makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to clear up a stranger's confused mind! :)
164.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
Thanks, now I understand how they reached the number but not why it's so convoluted. I only took one stats course in college. So it's P(bomb exploding in a century) = 1 - P(bomb not exploding in a century) = 1 - (P(bomb not explod
165.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
> I have 4-5 close friends I can hang out with every other week or so Is that so abnormal? I have the same experience after graduating a few years ago but always thought that was what happens to most people. Other than the friends you ma
166.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
> a 1% chance per year, that implies a 63% probability per century. I'm not sure I'm following the math here?
167.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/consent-o-mat...
168.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
have you tried right click > open in container > choose container? or right click on the tab > reopen in container > choose container
169.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
Does it need all that much space though? I mean Stable Diffusion was trained on hundreds of terrabytes of images, and the model only needs 4-5 GB of hardware space and a decent GPU to run. I haven't read anywhere any stats about GPT3&#
170.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
Is it bigger than the Stable Diffusion model? (4-5 GB)
171.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
I'm hoping of one day running GPT3/ChatGPT on my local computer, similarly to how one can run Stable Diffusion now. I would love to have a personal conversation with these AI systems, use them as a sort of assistant, without the w
172.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
There's a difference between simplifying and putting extra options under a setting, and removing things altogether.
173.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
"If you can't correctly implement a for loop using assembly, then the language can't save you, nothing can"
174.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
Right, cause why let the language do it automatically when you can use a bug prone manual implementation?
175.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
On the contrary, I think comments that push religion as some kind of romantic enlightenment of the past as opposed to science are the ones that don't belong on this site.
176.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
Ah yes, the hard earned social lesson of not wearing mixed fibers. Or not allowing women on their period to share the bed of their husband.
177.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
I laughed at your reply, but not so long ago (though before ChatGPT) I got downvoted to hell for asking a very similar question...
178.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
It feels like this whole list was compiled by one or very few people with no actual expertise. Why don't they ever consult the people about what words should make it on the list? I bet you most of the terms on that list are not even fo
179.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
Thanks, appreciate it!
180.
▲
by
anhner
4y ago
> Good Enough Parents There are at least three books with similar name, can you please say the author as well?
More ›