Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ang_cire
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
481.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
> For servers especially, ubuntu is often inappropriate. For instance a GUI is not often desirable in a server only computer. Ubuntu works fine headless. No one I know who uses Ubuntu on servers is using a GUI.
482.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
Because I regularly need to change configurations in snap applications, and it's a huge pain. Or I want the application to make use of files in a location, and they can't access them because they're snaps.
483.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
That's definitely true. I absolutely loathe snaps. I just don't know what distro I'd use instead for my headless servers.
484.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
"Mouse? Where we're going, we don't need mice."
485.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
10? If I am the 12th hire at a company and there's already a dedicated PM there, I'm out. 100, understandable.
486.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
I actually got it as a Christmas present from my step-mom who runs a print shop. :D
487.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
It's pretty self-explanatory? https://i.imgur.com/QqjsPge.jpg
488.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
I think you have either found additional context not shown here, or created it erroneously. This person was not part of an investigative team.
489.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
Your argument essentially sets up certain websites as being "more public" than others as a legal test for liability, in a way I can only assume would be based on Google index and search results (how Grandma finds it), which is
490.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
Going off my experience, it might be about not wanting to mix replacement part pools, or just biases about ARM being underpowered among management. It sounds like they're running everything on-prem, whereas a "cloud-native" o
491.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
As I read this, my homelab toilet servers in the next room are running x86 64-bit Ubuntu. My Framework 16 laptop is running x86 64-bit Ubuntu. My RPi 5 is running 64-bit Ubuntu (though that one is ARM). I used to have half a dozen dual-boot
492.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
I think he meant in his environment, not for IT in general.
493.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
This was not "releasing" information, though, it was already public. The "dark web" isn't someplace you require some special invite-only connection to, it's just regular websites (even if they use TOR) that any
494.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
If this is supposed to be some argument for how the free market actually provides accountability, I would love if you could cite the last health insurance company that died because of their poor business service .
495.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
This is wonderful news. The key thing people are missing is that TikTok is not being held responsible for the video content itself , they are being held responsible for their own code's actions. The video creator didn't share (or
496.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
If the post office opened your letter, read it, and then decided to copy it and send it to a bunch of kids, you would be responsible for your part in creating it, and they would be responsible for their part in disseminating it.
497.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
If the Mercedes infotainment screen had shown you a curated recommendation that you run them over, prior to you doing so, they very possibly would (and should).
498.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
"I have a catapult that launches loosely demo-targeted things, without me checking what is being loaded into it. I only intend for harmless things to be loaded. Should I be liable if someone loads a boulder and it hurts someone?"
499.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
RBAC is absolutely a practical security control, even for non-commercial users. Least necessary privilege is not a checkbox, it will 100% save your butt in a breach by limiting blast radius.
500.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
Sadly, I don't think many caught the joke :)
501.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
I wouldn't switch to Polars as a replacement to Pandas, given that Polars also seems likely to die soon. I'd also recommend avoiding Manatees.
502.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
I would also like to point out that the "long term" is just a collection of several "short terms", so if the short terms are only price increases (which they are), then the long term will also just be that.
503.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
I think the main discussion here is big SaaS companies using peoples' FOSS without giving anything back, either feature or cost-wise. No solution is perfect, but at least this would give you the ability to push back on a company that
504.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
Well, we could add commercial use prohibition into our OSS licenses.
505.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
$1 is ludicrously low as an OS licensing fee, if we're suggesting non-FOSS, proprietary alternatives.
506.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
Often it's repaid with another loan. If you have 100m in stock assets to leverage, you could literally go your entire life without needing to ever actually sell the stock to pay the rolling loans, even if your 100m of stock never appre
507.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
Increasing profits just enables attacking competitors in other ways than via product competition. The narrative that profits get turned into RnD instead of executive bonuses and stock buybacks or acquisitions is a Econ 101 fantasy. In the r
508.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
> If a company is able to price a product above their competitors and still succeed (e.g. by investing more in marketing), that's legal too. Yes, but it also runs counter to the idea that free markets tend to drive prices down throu
509.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
It's not incompetence, it's intentional. If police can mistreat you, it makes you scared to do anything that draws attention to yourself. US police departments grew out of municipal slave catching patrols, and union busters. They&
510.
▲
by
ang_cire
2y ago
And some are very big, too.
More ›