anemoiac

22 ms·

181.
by anemoiac 6y ago
What exactly don’t you like about this type of writing?
182.
by anemoiac 6y ago
"Employment" is actually below 62%, if we look at the percentage of the working age population that is employed. [1] 1. https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-lab...
183.
by anemoiac 6y ago
Ok, then let’s abolish all laws regarding economic activity (including private property) and abandon any related social conventions. Apparently they’re superfluous.
184.
by anemoiac 6y ago
> ...where is the proof that it won't hurt long term productivity, and where is the proof that it doesn't cause inflation[?] Assuming we could obtain reliable proof that UBI reduces productivity and/or increases inflatio
185.
by anemoiac 6y ago
Ah, that makes more sense.
186.
by anemoiac 6y ago
Is the Economic Policy Institute actually anti-immigration, or are you claiming that they oppose the H-1B system and are, therefore, “anti-immigration?”
187.
by anemoiac 6y ago
I agree with the sentiments expressed by the author, however redefining sustainable fishing before it’s been implemented widely seems a bit premature. Not that we can’t pursue that implementation alongside efforts to raise the bar, but, at
188.
by anemoiac 6y ago
Is there any reason to believe that the issues you describe would unfairly benefit one “side” over the other? It seems like restricting vote-by-mail certainly could.
189.
by anemoiac 6y ago
The JAMStack is a thing, and it seems to be gaining momentum.
190.
by anemoiac 6y ago
I assume that means providing financing to developing nations for the construction of coal plants.