andybak

13 ms·

211.
by andybak 1y ago
This is a very important point and mostly absent from the conversation. We have many words that almost mean the same thing or can mean ment different things - and conversations about intelligence and consciousness are riddled with them.
212.
by andybak 1y ago
Got past that but now hitting the bad request error that lots of people seem to have
213.
by andybak 1y ago
> Use with your ChatGPT plan It's asking me to buy credits but I'm already on Plus?
214.
by andybak 1y ago
I thought I was making a fairly obvious jokey riposte? "If you're claiming that em dashes are your method for detecting if text is AI generated then anyone who bothers to do a search/replace on the output will get past you.&q
215.
by andybak 1y ago
You will be foiled by a regex
216.
by andybak 1y ago
Is that not Codex? Or do you specifically mean the CLI interface?
217.
by andybak 1y ago
Not live for me in the UK. "Try it in ChatGPT" takes me to the normal page and there's no v5 listed in the dropdown.
218.
EuclideanSpace – Mathematics and Computing(euclideanspace.com)
3 points by andybak 1y ago|0 comments
219.
by andybak 1y ago
Why not just target OpenXR on either Android or Windows? The former would probably cover 95% of users.
220.
by andybak 1y ago
I'm still rather baffled. It's an immersive/spatial browser but it only runs on a Mac desktop and an AR headset I've never heard of. Can you see why people might be confused?
221.
by andybak 1y ago
So is there a build that can run on a headset? Preferably not a Vision Pro as I don't have access to one.
222.
by andybak 1y ago
Seeing words like "spatial" and "immersive" I was rather expecting it to run on at least one headset?
223.
by andybak 1y ago
> Read Brave New World if you haven't. I have and I don't see the connection with AI-assisted coding. If your comment was about "generative AI in general" then I think this is the problem with trying to discuss AI on
224.
by andybak 1y ago
Genuinely - what's the problem with this? It seems to be someone documenting a big increase in their productivity in a way that might be actually useful to others. They don't write like the kind of person you can dismiss out of ha
225.
by andybak 1y ago
> Read carefully. I don't want to play games. I've apparently overlooked something so feel free to explain it to me.
226.
by andybak 1y ago
I sometimes use a VR headset instead of a monitor but I do end up using a laptop because of the keyboard and touchpad. I can conceive of using maybe a phone, an ultra light headset and a compact keyboard and TouchPad combined? I'm usua
227.
by andybak 1y ago
> There's no forms that need to be completed. One of us has completely misunderstood the legislation. By my reading - there's a ton of red tape and paperwork. Heck, there's a ton of work even getting to the point of under
228.
by andybak 1y ago
[flagged]
229.
by andybak 1y ago
So all AI generated code is "slop"? Without exception? Without any nuance? It's hard to take opinions like that seriously and not just dismiss them as hyperbole.
230.
by andybak 1y ago
Except they don't mean "specific examples of AI content are slop". They unambiguously say that all uses of generative AI are slop.
231.
by andybak 1y ago
> We don't need photorealism in games, but it does help with immersion. This is a blanket statement I would disagree with. > Many people, like me, feel like they are inside the game world, rather than playing a game with a TV&#x2
232.
by andybak 1y ago
I had a similar experience in a a game meant to simulate regular city car driving. Most releveant to this comment thread however was the fact that the graphics were very crude and not in a good way. I absolutely dispute the claim that rea
233.
by andybak 1y ago
Agree that something seems off about this whole thing.
234.
by andybak 1y ago
Out of interest, which country are you writing that from?
235.
by andybak 1y ago
And who is that?
236.
by andybak 1y ago
Or we need to do a tiny bit more research before jumping to conclusions. UK law in this regard is far from perfect but this thread is mainly uninformed knee-jerking.
237.
by andybak 1y ago
> as far as I understand If you're going to post about something so contentious, then bring receipts. We've all got things we vaguely remember that confirm our prejudices. But posting them without fact-checking oneself is cross
238.
by andybak 1y ago
> it was her speech that got her a multi-year jail term. Are we really going to have to have the "shouting fire in a crowded theatre" conversation? I think there is some nuance to the conversation about this woman - but you are
239.
by andybak 1y ago
Maybe it's because it's threatening people that aren't used to being potentially powerless in this way. And those are the kind of people I tend to interact with. I didn't spend much time chatting to people working in hea
240.
by andybak 1y ago
OK - so I deeply value human creativity and I disagree with your first statement. At least I think we don't currently know whether it will work out this way. My hunch is that human creativity is incredibly resilient and will route ar

More ›