andrewnc

26 ms·

211.
by andrewnc 7y ago
I wonder how many of these shops exist. And if they're mostly solo operations?
212.
by andrewnc 7y ago
You might be interested in svelte.dev it's a JavaScript mini-framework of sorts. I'd consider it more of a library, but it's quite nice.
213.
by andrewnc 7y ago
Agreed, I think the parent comment was implying that those few services are making a disproportionate amount of the company's revenue compared to what most employees are working on
214.
by andrewnc 7y ago
I would like to join the chat, if there is still room!
215.
by andrewnc 7y ago
This is neat, but one important point is that networks NEED to be significantly over parameterized for SGD like methods to find the minima. I know that's slightly tangential. Another interesting point is that NNs can be thought about a
216.
by andrewnc 7y ago
AFAIK that was at the very beginning of the venture, maybe financials are more stable now.
217.
by andrewnc 7y ago
That's true. I bet we'll see many more different sorts of jobs open up as tech increases in complexity.
218.
by andrewnc 8y ago
What ended up happening to your company?
219.
by andrewnc 8y ago
I've actually been bouncing this idea around for a bit. How many people do you know that are interested in an IF publishing platform?
220.
by andrewnc 8y ago
That's actually a fascinating idea. Do you think it would have to operate on PDFs? How would that work without the LaTex source?
221.
by andrewnc 8y ago
This looks awesome! I'm excited to try it out.
222.
by andrewnc 9y ago
First, thank you for being willing to try it out! The results can be... underwhelming... at times. However, we're working hard to really nailing down the tech and so if you stick with it for the next few weeks, I think you'd be pl
223.
by andrewnc 9y ago
These look like great resources! Thank you!
224.
by andrewnc 9y ago
Alright, there is a screen shot of some of our results on the site for now. Thanks again!
225.
by andrewnc 9y ago
That's a solid idea. A couple of people have suggested it. I'm working on one right now to put up on the site. Thanks for the suggestion!
226.
by andrewnc 9y ago
Currently we divide it up into 3 categories. 1. What you agree 2. What they agree 3. Other terms But you're right. There is good room for thought there. We're working on an example to put on the homepage. It's a good suggest
227.
by andrewnc 9y ago
Oh that's awesome! I hadn't thought of that. This would really allow people to change behavior based on the information they get. That's great. Thank you!
228.
by andrewnc 9y ago
Great feedback! 1) That is an awesome idea, I hadn't thought of that. We'll put that together. 2) Right now its sumy/regex/bs4 for our tech. As you can see, it's nothing complex, but we're hoping to had some re
229.
by andrewnc 9y ago
This is an awesome question, and one that was raised by the lawyer on our team. Since summarization is not a lossless process, there will be some information that the user doesn't see. For now, we have a blanket disclaimer that our pro
230.
by andrewnc 9y ago
If you're referring to the hackathon award. They combined the award to say "best use of AI/Blockchain" we qualified as using AI, but are not using Blockchain
231.
by andrewnc 9y ago
You're probably right. That was the number we got from our initial user interest survey
232.
by andrewnc 9y ago
This is a great question that we're working on. It obviously will never be as good as reading the whole thing, but you're right, how can it be improved?
233.
by andrewnc 9y ago
Yes, you guys are right. Currently it uses NLP text summarization. Next steps would be to incorporate some from of NaiveBayes to pick out "odd" sentences that are the norm in most documents.
234.
Show HN: Using AI to Summarize Terms and Conditions
91 points by andrewnc 9y ago|41 comments