Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
andrewla
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
The cube test is an interesting one, but, to pile on another stupid internet trend, that seems more like a "shape-rotator" vs. "word-cel" question. For very simple fold-ups I can do this, but for more complex decompositi
32.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
Maybe you're right, but there are people on this thread claiming that they can actually see things in their field of vision, not "akin to seeing things" but see-see them. I can't do this and I don't think I have aph
33.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
I actually agree with you about the "is my red the same as your red" -- I do not believe that aphantasia is real but simply that people are talking past each other and getting hung up on semantics. I see things with my eyes, exper
34.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
In a sense I agree with you that this is the intent of the article. I find this kind of laughable because I do not consider myself to have aphantasia (I can visualize things just fine) but the afterimage test is not even vaguely representat
35.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
So you would be "No, I cannot, and I don't think I have aphantasia" -- that's where I am too
36.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
I created https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49469365 to see how many people perceive things this way. It is quite possible that this is drawing a line, as you say, between hyperphantashia and regular phantasia, though I&
37.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
I made a poll to see if anyone can (like D-Machine or jhedwards) actually see a superimposed image and not just "see" a superimposed image: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49469365
38.
▲
Poll: Are You Aphantastic
5 points
by
andrewla
1mo ago
|
10 comments
39.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
No, I cannot, and I think I have aphantasia
40.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
No, I cannot, and I don't think I have aphantasia
41.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
Yes, I can, literally, not just imagine what it would look like
42.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
I mean, I can look at a blank wall, and if you say "superimpose a red circle in the middle of the wall" I can very easily imagine that wall with a red circle on it. But I can't "see" it in the sense that you can see
43.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
It would take a lot to convince me that aphantasia or phantasia actually exist. Let's talk very specifically about the afterimage test here. Can anyone confirm that they have this ability, which specifically is to superimpose imagined
44.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
You also won't find Thomas making this argument for birthright citizenship because he didn't make that argument for birthright citizenship. The post you are replying to is incorrect, this was not his argument.
45.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
"Paying taxes" cannot be an important part of this. At the time this amendment was passed, income taxes not only did not exist, but were also unconstitutional.
46.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
I'm guessing that you did not actually read his dissent. Far from agreeing with the Trump administration; his view would effectively end birth tourism but preserve birthright citizenship (and maybe even stronger) for the children of no
47.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
Obviously it doesn't scale, but buying from small sellers has the advantage that the risks are completely decoupled. You might get cyclosporin or whatever, but it's not going to be a million people being hit by the same thing.
48.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
It's all client side -- someone (maybe me!) would spin up openkeychron from an old saved copy of the webpage and we'd be back in business in a day. Right now the keychron-hosted solution is fine -- no accounts or anything crazy --
49.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
I don't expect to get any sort of explanation from Amazon of course. I do think they are probably doing something that is hurting them financially. Acquired goodwill is extremely hard to measure and shows up in things like long-term cu
50.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
I have used this shop, but I do not agree that the experience is a good one. It is abysmal -- the standard for tiktok shop / aliexpress / temu is to offer you all sorts of "deals" that never actually apply. "Oh, you
51.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
It's confusing to me that amazon is in the ads business at all though. They're a retail service, not an ad business and it seems that all the ad business does is burn goodwill. They do have goodwill to burn, but it cheapens the en
52.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
This project is more deeply technical but one thing I find fun is to take a video from a moving train and create a video stereogram by having one eye lagging in time/distance behind the other eye, letting you create very long baseline
53.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
In Python there are definitely times with large environments where you get combinatorial corners where things go exponential -- at scale processing user workloads and environments we've definitely hit sharp corners here. Switching to b
54.
▲
by
andrewla
1mo ago
Very true! What makes NP-hard problems difficult is almost always the combinatorial explosion related to specific problem configurations -- you can construct instances given an approximate heuristic or branch-and-bound solver that will caus
55.
▲
by
andrewla
2mo ago
In all fairness, *I'm* not trying to solve anything with technology. I'm arguing that it *can't* be solved with technology.
56.
▲
by
andrewla
2mo ago
No, this is like saying that we should hold the fax machine liable for one PD faxing an APB to another one, or the concept of radio waves responsible when a PD dispatcher announcement for a a BOLO.
57.
▲
by
andrewla
2mo ago
1. I for one do not want "Flock Safety" in the loop for this at all. Police departments can flag a license plate in the system; that's on them. Flock is just a tool for departments to communicate what would previously have be
58.
▲
by
andrewla
2mo ago
If a human had spotted the license plate that had been flagged with an All Points Bulletin or an Amber Alert the same outcome would have occurred. It's hard to see why Flock is even mentioned in this except for clickbait purposes. From
59.
▲
by
andrewla
2mo ago
This is the correct answer. The problem is that copyright law was created in a higher friction environment and it cannot adapt to the present. If I bought a book, made a xerox of the whole thing, and then sold the book to another party, I h
60.
▲
by
andrewla
2mo ago
Blockchain solves the double spend and ownership problems, but it does requires (a) that you be connected to the internet to establish or transfer ownership, and (b) that any consumer of encrypted data respect the blockchain state as well.
More ›