anamexis

19 ms·

361.
by anamexis 2y ago
Sure, any payroll company (or their hackers) knows your salary.
362.
by anamexis 2y ago
Don't you need to specifically authorize someone to use that to get your salary?
363.
by anamexis 3y ago
It took me a couple weeks to get up to speed on my ortholinear keyboard (Keyboardio Model 100), but it really is worth it to stick with it! It makes a lot more sense ergonomically.
364.
by anamexis 3y ago
Most people don't start working from birth, either.
365.
by anamexis 3y ago
The OP says it is Cocoa-less in the readme, is that not true?
366.
by anamexis 3y ago
You're not replying to the OP.
367.
by anamexis 3y ago
This wasn't a science study.
368.
by anamexis 3y ago
Given that these images are infrared, that wouldn't be much.
369.
by anamexis 3y ago
Well, not before they left the gate
370.
by anamexis 3y ago
Alternative solution: check bathrooms before leaving
371.
by anamexis 3y ago
I meant number of blunders per game at low ELOs. I stand by my estimation that even at 800, even a 5 minute game would have a median blunder count of 1 or 2. Which is hardly a constant stream of blunders, which is what I was trying to point
372.
by anamexis 3y ago
Do you have better data, or are you just being an asshole?
373.
by anamexis 3y ago
My point was that it's not an extreme edge case, it's quite common, even at the 700-1000 chess.com ELO level.
374.
by anamexis 3y ago
I'm talking about daily/correspondence games.
375.
by anamexis 3y ago
No argument there, but that has nothing to do with my point that novices at chess aren't just playing constant blunders when playing each other.
376.
by anamexis 3y ago
If anything that reinforces my point that low-rated players aren't losing in a series of constant blunders.
377.
by anamexis 3y ago
I don't think that's true. Speaking as someone sub-1000 rated who plays lots of other people in the same region, the computer evals don't typically show a series of blunders. 1 or 2 blunders per game is common, but blunder-le
378.
by anamexis 3y ago
Why is it important that those functions use the double underscore naming convention?
379.
by anamexis 3y ago
Well, if it costs $10,000 all-in to pay a developer for 1 month, and Creo costs $30/month, then it would take 27 years to break even on having a developer spend the extra month building it from scratch.
380.
by anamexis 3y ago
Federal prisons do not have parole.
381.
by anamexis 3y ago
Well, there's no expectation in unicode that something viewed as a letter in its own right should use a single codepoint.
382.
by anamexis 3y ago
Presumably because humans are great apes.
383.
by anamexis 3y ago
I don't think that's what Rye is doing. It's doing if(cond, effect1, effect2) where effect1 and effect2 are functions, and only evaluating the matching effect function. But everything is functions.
384.
by anamexis 3y ago
"if" is the "if" expression - https://ryelang.org/meet_rye/basics/if_either/
385.
by anamexis 3y ago
I don't think it's a mistake - just a cheeky note that if you "saw it fall," you probably didn't. Your own link supports this. > If you saw a meteor and later found a stone, then the stone is not a meteorite >
386.
by anamexis 3y ago
Why not?
387.
by anamexis 3y ago
I think this is the relevant bit from RFC 9110: > A client SHOULD NOT generate content in a DELETE request unless it is made directly to an origin server that has previously indicated, in or out of band, that such a request has a purpose
388.
by anamexis 3y ago
The article does not mention POSIX, or anything about listing files, at all.
389.
by anamexis 3y ago
> The question isn’t if it’s possible, because of course it is, the question is if it’s portable and well supported with the POSIX interface. Because if it’s not, then… Where did this goalpost come from? S3 is not portable or POSIX compl
390.
by anamexis 3y ago
Well sure, but your account email isn't safe to be public if your password is "password".

More ›