an-unknown

17 ms·

31.
by an-unknown 3y ago
That works if you want to select between different inputs, but it doesn't work if you want to mix multiple inputs. From the description it sounded like the goal here is to mix multiple inputs, all with potentially different volumes, in
32.
by an-unknown 3y ago
> when I was looking at this ~6 months ago, it seemed that most of the options were surface mount That's because most components today are only available as SMD. Once you play around with higher speed digital chips, breadboards are
33.
by an-unknown 3y ago
If you want to just buy a thing that exists, you could look for one of the "high end" networked audio interfaces out there with on-board DSP mixing + network control, e.g. MOTU AVB interfaces support that (e.g. MOTU 16A + some TOS
34.
by an-unknown 3y ago
Take the gerber files from the Github repo, zip them, upload the zip file to jlcpcb.com, and you'll get 5 boards for around $20 including shipment. You'll still need the components like the AVR and LEDs and so on and you'll h
35.
by an-unknown 3y ago
This could be used with modular synthesizer stuff, but you would have to be very careful about voltages, since the "logic module" here uses 3V and you'll most likely kill it with higher voltages or negative voltages on the
36.
by an-unknown 3y ago
Yes, but if you connect a computer screen to a server, you'll notice that servers usually don't have GPUs for anything beyond "show a 1280x1024 console screen". Unlike a server, the Steam Deck is literally marketed as a
37.
by an-unknown 3y ago
The interesting question here would be if "Tell all their 3rd party publishers to stop publishing on Steam" would be legally OK or if it would result in a lawsuit against Nintendo because of e.g. anti-competitive behavior.
38.
by an-unknown 3y ago
I think you are overestimating the difficulty of producing something. Start building stuff as a hobby, and decide that you want to build it as efficiently as possible because you are lazy. You'll quickly realize that building synthesiz
39.
by an-unknown 3y ago
> How do you mean, support mmap efficiently? Do you mean being able to close the mapping without a GC? If so then Panama is fixing that. Everything relevant that can be done with Panama in this context can already be done in a Truffle la
40.
by an-unknown 3y ago
> But the technique is general. It's not scripting or JVM specific and there's no specific reason the language your interpreter reads has to be textual. […] And that's how you can run C or any other language on the JVM wit
41.
by an-unknown 3y ago
> What would be the point? For example, what would you gain by having a C compiler that compiled to bytecode? You would use it for the same thing that you can do with GraalVM Enterprise today: use native libraries written in C/Fortr
42.
by an-unknown 3y ago
> currently the cheapest alternative on Mouser is ~$5 (STM32F730V8T6TR). And that will have less flash! Yes and no: with the STM32 you don't necessarily need an external flash chip (= significantly less PCB space consumed) and you g
43.
by an-unknown 3y ago
Seems like you never saw or used SpectraLayers (commercial tool from Steinberg) or Sonic Visualiser (OSS project). Both have much more advanced visualization capabilities than RX. However, RX definitely has the more advanced "semi-auto
44.
by an-unknown 4y ago
But where is the fun then? You can easily build rather fancy CPUs on an FPGA, fancy enough to boot a small Linux system in the end.
45.
by an-unknown 4y ago
To be fair, a lot of software already supports POWER right now, including the Linux kernel, compiler toolchains, the OpenJDK, various database engines, and so on. Don't forget that a lot of embedded devices used PowerPC in the past a
46.
by an-unknown 4y ago
Yes, there are open core IPs for POWER: - https://github.com/OpenPOWERFoundation/a2i - https://github.com/OpenPOWERFoundation/a2o - https://github.com/antonblanchard/microwatt
47.
by an-unknown 4y ago
If I compare this feature list to e.g. features of xterm (VT52/VT100/VT220/VT320/VT420/partial VT520 support, graphics via Sixel/ReGIS/Tek4014, …), I don't see a single reason why wezterm should be ro
48.
by an-unknown 4y ago
> xterm was still better than most lightweight libvt-based terminals Even worse: although many terminal emulators claim to emulate some "ANSI" terminal or be "VT100 compatible" and so on, most of them aren't at a
49.
by an-unknown 4y ago
> No human ear can hear frequencies above ~22kHz, meaning anything over the normal ~44kHz sample rate provably makes no difference. The real fun is when "audiophiles" give you music with high sample rate (e.g. 384kHz) and it so
50.
by an-unknown 4y ago
> Some songs were harsh and sounded too airy. Chances are you hear production mistakes/errors in these songs that you simply couldn't notice on the "worse" headphones. And if you produce music yourself, such "bet
51.
by an-unknown 4y ago
> I saw that the chip itself is surface mount, would I need to make my own PCBs to be able to make more "permanent" projects with it? If you want to directly use an RP2040 chip: yes, but you can do that for a few $ at e.g. jlcp
52.
by an-unknown 4y ago
> If your product needs to do X, Y, and Z, and that can be built in arduino in a few days, and built in some other "professional" toolchain in a few months, then you will save money by building your real product on arduino. Not
53.
by an-unknown 4y ago
> Nobody writes safe C. Believing otherwise is delusional. This has been known for decades. But many believers still exist. This is factually incorrect. You can write safe C code which is even correct according to some specification, as
54.
by an-unknown 4y ago
First of all, not everything has a big CPU: there are countless small embedded devices which have e.g. just an FPGA or maybe an FPGA and a microcontroller. Example: if you look into e.g. a MOTU AVB audio interface, you will only find one or
55.
by an-unknown 4y ago
Simulation in software is much slower than running the design in FPGAs.
56.
by an-unknown 4y ago
RISC has nothing to do with instruction counts. Think of it as a "set of reduced instructions", not a "reduced set of instructions". It's the fact that every instruction only does something "simple" which
57.
by an-unknown 4y ago
This is factually wrong. There are even multiple different authentication and encryption schemes defined for telnet, see e.g.: https://www.iana.org/assignments/telnet-options/telnet-optio... Just because some old
58.
by an-unknown 4y ago
Not sure why everyone thinks that telnet is "not suitable for today especially in the case of security", although telnet over TLS exists. There are also certain things that telnet can do which SSH cannot (e.g. transport data for a
59.
by an-unknown 4y ago
> and in fact the VM pretty much has to be written in C What makes you think that you need C/C++ for this? Compilers were and still are written in many languages, and you can always come up with a compiler written in an "arbitr
60.
by an-unknown 4y ago
And which of these announcements really required manual intervention on a VPS running a webserver? A webserver clearly doesn't use a GUI library like wxwidgets, probably won't run keycloak, and the GRUB change depends on your envi

More ›