amirrajan

8 ms·

91.
Show HN: Sortis - A Twitter client for power users, and a springboard for devs(github.com)
1 points by amirrajan 13y ago|0 comments
92.
GTD - Genin Tsuikyu Dammit(amirrajan.net)
1 points by amirrajan 13y ago|0 comments
93.
by amirrajan 13y ago
I'm in the same boat right now. I quit my job and am on a "learning" sabbatical right now myself. Some of the reasons you stated where mine too.. maybe some of the lessons I've learned so far may help: http://
94.
The Microsoft Manifesto(amirrajan.net)
2 points by amirrajan 13y ago|0 comments
95.
Why So Mean?(amirrajan.net)
1 points by amirrajan 13y ago|0 comments
96.
Rebooting Life(amirrajan.net)
1 points by amirrajan 13y ago|0 comments
97.
by amirrajan 13y ago
What you are seeing is an the output/result of a stack trace that's been parsed. There is a backing ruby file that will take a stack trace and generate what you're seeing.
98.
by amirrajan 13y ago
Looking for feedback if you have any. Best viewed in Chrome with high res monitor. If you want a "flat" view...just use Internet Explorer :-P. This is the output/result of running a C#/.Net stack trace through StackTracePreview.rb (a clas
99.
Show HN: Stack Trace Visualization for C#/.Net(amirrajan.github.io)
2 points by amirrajan 13y ago|3 comments
100.
by amirrajan 14y ago
That's what I need clarification on. the dynamic keyword wasn't provided by any 3rd party library (it's part of the C# language specification)... how is System.DynamicObject and IDynamicMetaObjectProvider different then System.Object? All
101.
by amirrajan 14y ago
"but you're still not applying this mixin to a poco" Clarify?
102.
by amirrajan 14y ago
You're right. The var keyword isn't dynamic typing. The dynamic keyword is though. dynamic C# 4.0 can do mixins, method missing, etc: http://amirrajan.net/Blog/dynamic-c-sharp
103.
by amirrajan 14y ago
That is a false statement. dynamic C# 4.0 can do mixins: http://amirrajan.net/Blog/dynamic-c-sharp
104.
by amirrajan 14y ago
I can see how that can be confusing. Rails is a development stack. It gives you exactly what's needed to get an app up and running quickly. It also provides the means to keep the app maintainable. Oak tries to provide that same experience t
105.
by amirrajan 14y ago
There are just those devs that don't have the privilege of working with something that isn't .Net. This provides those individuals with a way to experience frictionless web development in the stack their tied to :-).
106.
by amirrajan 14y ago
Just a little bit of background. Oak builds upon ASP.NET MVC, but leverages the dynamic capabilities of C#. I wanted to create a stack that is FRICTIONLESS to work with (a concept that is foreign to .Net devs :-P). I've been working on this
107.
Show HN: Oak - dynamic C# and ASP.NET MVC (Rails Inspired)(amirrajan.github.com)
16 points by amirrajan 14y ago|5 comments
108.
by amirrajan 14y ago
Any similarities to the bird flocking algorithm when compared to a force directed graph? Here's a link to a force directed graph I did in HTML5: http://amirrajan.net/Home/FdgHtml5
109.
by amirrajan 14y ago
Just a little bit of background. Oak builds upon ASP.NET MVC, but leverages the dynamic capabilities of C#. I wanted to create a stack that is FRICTIONLESS to work with (a concept that is foreign to .Net devs :-P). I've been working on th
110.
Feedback wanted on OSS: Oak - Dynamic ASP.NET MVC (Ruby on Rails inspired)(amirrajan.github.com)
1 points by amirrajan 14y ago|1 comments