ambicapter

3 ms·

31.
by ambicapter 22d ago
There's this trend on the internet to attribute success at any remotely technically challenging problem to the glorious power of autism.
32.
by ambicapter 23d ago
"Looking for motivated people willing to do anything for money"
33.
by ambicapter 23d ago
Long-term traders don't need the price to be as "efficient" as possible by definition.
34.
by ambicapter 24d ago
Glad I finally have a name (flow battery) for a concept that I've been wanting to be made for a long time (liquid batteries).
35.
by ambicapter 24d ago
Launchdarkly and Statsig are both well-established companies that basically do feature flags+add-ons.
36.
by ambicapter 25d ago
It doesn't matter if you can explain it in a novel way if your novel way doesn't correspond to your listener's ability. So it is possible they can explain it in a different way but still don't know how to explain it in a
37.
by ambicapter 29d ago
> Approximately 80 organizations were listed as having access to Pflugerville's Flock system, Coffman said, and city staff members have stated Pflugerville does not provide its ALPR data via statewide and nationwide sharing networks
38.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
That's funny, we talk about the LLM only having a single data channel as a bad thing for security, but I'd never put 2+2 together to realize the LLM can poison itself as well.
39.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
You can work even with UBI in place.
40.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
I know her name, but I definitely can't name anything she's done.
41.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
> filled with exceptionally bad ideas. Name one, just for discussion's sake.
42.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
Using a compass is interesting, use two razor blades taped together is much easier and it’s close enough to perfect parallel lines.
43.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
> not a perplexing multi-faceted, engineering problem to be solved It's a common mistake, not a deep, interesting one.
44.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
This list is comically long, holy shit.
45.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
This is just you repeating "I don't need to prove anything, it's obvious" over and over again.
46.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
[citation needed]
47.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
> I believe AI is basically an amplifier of bad and good. Same can be said of technology in general tbh.
48.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
I think the problem is Google stopped prioritizing search quality and instead let ads and now AI content dominate their search.
49.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
Maybe they get tired of doing that after they go through a PhD :)
50.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
I mean, you're not wrong.
51.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
> Similar to what others have noticed, and as I predicted 8 months ago, better models are requiring less ceremony to work effectively. > On the flip side, this may imply that as the models get better, they’ll become harder to control.
52.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
What is it missing to be called a query engine?
53.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
The convenient accelerationist take that lets you do whatever you want, all the time.
54.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
It's never enough for purity tests.
55.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
> being a coined word or quasi-synonym for something that is already named in the code base. This annoys me with a lot of LLM code. They rename things for the hell of it all the time.
56.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
I believe it. Being bad just has a better marketing campaign.
57.
by ambicapter 1mo ago
"Collaborative Agentic Editing" "Why you'd do that code like that?" "Dunno, that's what Cursor did" "Cool"
58.
by ambicapter 2mo ago
Yeah, bad things are easier to do when you can accomplish them more "efficiently". Thus, the moral hazard.
59.
by ambicapter 2mo ago
How does "the tool" know its a motor vehicle accident call, and how does it know when the caller is within 200 meters of an already reported crash? Seems like the screening will have to happen on all calls.
60.
by ambicapter 2mo ago
I would say they are not civilized. They are deadly serious.

More ›