amaury_bouchard

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by amaury_bouchard 7mo ago

   I haven't tried it personally, but I don't see any reason why they wouldn't work well together. µJS manipulates the DOM via fetch and swapping, while web components live in the DOM like any other element. The only thing to be
2. 32.▲
   by amaury_bouchard 7mo ago

   pjax is actually listed as an inspiration in the README. It's a great project, but it hasn't been maintained since 2018 and requires jQuery. µJS is dependency-free and covers a much broader feature set.
3. 33.▲
   by amaury_bouchard 7mo ago

   Thanks for the list! Yes, the name is used by several projects. Mine is the browser navigation one — hopefully the "µJS" name, the .org domain and the use case make it distinct enough.
4. 34.▲
   by amaury_bouchard 7mo ago

   Wow thanks a lot! That's very kind, I really appreciate it :)
5. 35.▲
   by amaury_bouchard 7mo ago

   Thanks for the suggestion! I'm considering adding more libraries to the comparison page (Datastar and Unpoly are on my radar). That said, µJS and Datastar have quite different philosophies. µJS is a lightweight AJAX navigation library
6. 36.▲
   Show HN: µJS, a 5KB alternative to Htmx and Turbo with zero dependencies(mujs.org)

   161 points by amaury_bouchard 7mo ago|92 comments