alwillis

29 ms·

511.
OpenAI's o3 model bests the newer GPT-5 model on complex, multi-app office tasks(the-decoder.com)
3 points by alwillis 1y ago|0 comments
512.
by alwillis 1y ago
Wispr Flow is shockingly good at dictation; I use the free version on macOS [1]. [1]: https://wisprflow.ai/use-cases
513.
by alwillis 1y ago
You can code in Swift and even submit to the App Store using Swift Playground using an iPad [1]. [1]: https://developer.apple.com/swift-playground/
514.
Apple machine learning privacy workshop talks released(appleinsider.com)
1 points by alwillis 1y ago|0 comments
515.
by alwillis 1y ago
He’s complaining that his apps aren’t ranking higher on Apple’s most popular apps charts. This is just another billionaire complaining about being a victim.
516.
by alwillis 1y ago
There are plenty of free models available; many that rival their paid counterparts. A kid interested in trying stuff can use Qwen Coder for free [1]. If the kid's school has Apple Silicon Macs (or iPads), this fall, each one of them wi
517.
Musk threatens legal action against Apple over alleged antitrust violations(cnbc.com)
12 points by alwillis 1y ago|3 comments
518.
by alwillis 1y ago
Keep in mind each Claude subagent gets its own context.
519.
by alwillis 1y ago
You can already use non-Anthropic models with Claude Code with tools like Claude Code Router [1]. [1]: https://github.com/musistudio/claude-code-router
520.
by alwillis 1y ago
For example, Gemini CLI [1] can use native sandboxing on macOS. It's just a matter of time before every major coding agent will run inside of an operating system's native sandbox/container/jail/VM. [1]: https:&#x2F
521.
by alwillis 1y ago
If we're not there already, it's just a matter of time before LLMs will be able to read and understand a framework they haven't seen before and be able to use it anyway. LLMs are already trained on JavaScript at a deep level;
522.
by alwillis 1y ago
> Better prompts? I think you're right. People getting really poor results probably don't recognize that their prompts aren't very good. I think some users make assumptions about what the model can't do before they
523.
by alwillis 1y ago
> Cursor on the other hand, especially with GPT-5 today but typically with Sonnet 4.1 You probably mean Opus 4.1; there's no Sonnet 4.1 yet.
524.
by alwillis 1y ago
Neovim editing has come a long way; you go from barebones (no plugins) to full-blown IDE and everything in between. There are lots of pre-configured Neovim distributions if you don't want to roll your own, such as LazyVim [1]. There ar
525.
by alwillis 1y ago
I had no issues dropping a demo 100-row spreadsheet into Claude and was able to ask questions. This particular spreadsheet was in the old-school .xsl format, and only Claude just dealt with it. ChatGPT accepted it but said it couldn't
526.
by alwillis 1y ago
At that point, companies might rediscover the ROI of good old meat based AI. That’s like saying when the price of gasoline gets too high, people will stop driving. Once a lifestyle is based on driving (like commuting from the suburbs to a
527.
by alwillis 1y ago
From Anthropic’s Reddit account: One user consumed tens of thousands in model usage on a $200 plan. Though we're developing solutions for these advanced use cases, our new rate limits will ensure a more equitable experience for all us
528.
by alwillis 1y ago
Yes and no. It’s very expensive to create these models and serve them at scale. Eventually the processing power required to create them will come down, but that’s going to be a while. Even if there was a breakthrough GPU technology announce
529.
by alwillis 1y ago
You will start seriously worrying about coding AI bills within 6 months Nope. More open models ship everyday and are 80% cheaper for similar and sometimes better performance, depending on the task. You can use Qwen-3 Coder (a 480 billion
530.
by alwillis 1y ago
What’s different is all the open weight models like Kimi-k2 or Qwen-3 Coder that are as good and, depending on the task, better than Anthropic’s Sonnet model for 80% less via openrouter [1] and other similar services. You can use these mode
531.
by alwillis 1y ago
As you probably know, inline CSS isn't cached, so it has to be downloaded every time, which is a waste of bandwidth. Obviously 2 lines probably isn't worth making an external CSS file for; but thousands of lines are. You can prefe
532.
by alwillis 1y ago
And in the time it takes to do all of that, the guy could have already written a meaningful commit message and be done with that issue for the day. You only have to describe how you want commits written once and then the AI will just ha
533.
by alwillis 1y ago
But my understanding is Claude Code is closed source and only support Clade API endpoint. How do they make it work? You set the environment variable ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL to an OpenAI-compatible endpoint and ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN to the API t
534.
Anthropic CEO admits compromising with authoritarian regimes to get AI funding(the-decoder.com)
10 points by alwillis 1y ago|4 comments
535.
Perplexity Comet, Dia Browser, Opera Neon: How Agentic Browsers Will Change Web(pullflow.com)
3 points by alwillis 1y ago|1 comments
536.
Evaluate a person online like investor Graham Duncan(diabrowser.com)
1 points by alwillis 1y ago|0 comments
537.
by alwillis 1y ago
> Jujutsu also has a notion of immutable commits, by default meaning (roughly) commits which have been pushed upstream. This makes sense to me as a longtime Mercurial user. In short, by default, when you push a commit, it becomes public
538.
by alwillis 1y ago
You can’t underestimate the viral nature of vibe coding which was almost exclusively done using Cursor and Windsurf. There are tons of YouTube videos boosting both products. Claude Code grabbed tons of attention because it uses the command
539.
by alwillis 1y ago
If LLMs were actually useful, there would be no need to scream it everywhere. On the contrary: it would be a guarded secret. LLMs are useful—but there’s no way such an innovation should be a “guarded secret” even at this early stage. It
540.
by alwillis 1y ago
That’s disingenuous; it’s not just Apple. Neither Amazon or Google are going to pay $200 million dollar salaries, never mind Apple. I suspect these companies will figure out how to respond to these types of offers without blowing up their

More ›