Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alt227
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
781.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> That left Cubase for windows When I was at music college doing production courses, they exclusively taught Cubase on windows.
782.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Prosumer, but not pro. Pixar for example are not modelling and animating on Apple Silicon. On the video side Vegas Pro is used in a lot of production houses, and it does not run on Apple Silicon at all.
783.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> The alternative is death - they do nothing, they're going to die. Thats a subjective opinion. Plenty of people still value higher power multi core chips over apple silicon, because they are still better at doing real work. I dont
784.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Yep, but only because of Apples terrible design. Take those same chips and put them in a machine with proper cooling and they fly. Its frustrating when Apple fans always blame that situation on intel, when in reality Apple messed up the des
785.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
The important part of this is 'Single threaded'. Whereas if you are actually using Cinebench to do real rendering you would always want multi core performance. Which pretty much makes Apples single Core benchmark results pointless
786.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
However the latency of DDR is much better than LPDDR, so its pros and cons.
787.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> As a general purpose computer Apple is impossible to beat Only if all you care about is having a laptop with really fast single core performance. Anything that requires real grunt needs a workstation or server which Apple silicon conno
788.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> there is no alternative to a Mac nowadays I need to point this out all the time these days it seems, but this opinion is only valid if all you use is a laptop and all you care about is single core perfomance. The computing world is far
789.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> A huge reason for the low power usage is the iPhone. No, the main reason for better battery life is the RISC architecture. PC on ARM architecture has the same gains.
790.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> Right, we're going to go in an entirely different direction, and provide you with something absolutely mind-blowing, but we're going to have to do software emulation for backward compatibility and that will suck for a while u
791.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Apple purposely make it so after 3 new versions of the OS you cannot upgrade the OS on the hardware any further. This in turn means you cannot install new software as the applications themselves require the newer versions of the OS. It has
792.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Nope, laptops are just very cheap thin clients to remote onto the desktops with much higher power. This gives the advantage of being able to leave things compiling whilst you shut your laptop at the end of the day.
793.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Yep, but then the laptop just becomes a screen and keyboard and can be the cheapest on the market. Remoting into your desktop to code is much more efficient than actually coding on a laptop, especially if you care about compile time. Then y
794.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> why even have meetings in the first place Exactly. I personally have never been in a meeting which I thought was absolutely necessary. Except maybe new fire regs.
795.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Right, so Im assuming that as you are saying 'Half the web runs on java', maybe you know more about what websites are using in their backend? Care to share where you are getting this information from?
796.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
I have found that the success of things like this depend greatly on so many factors such as office type, location, team moral, management style, individual personalities, even mean age etc. I have worked in places where the exact opposite o
797.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Multi monitor support is still flaky and unreliable, cant boot linux environments, cant upgrade M.2 drives yourself, magic mouse still cannot be charged whilst using it etc etc. On top of that when you look at price vs performance they are
798.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
In my experience comments like these are generally made by people who dont have much experience outside of using laptops.
799.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Sorry I meant to reply to this post above, who linked the blog post which mentions the 17PB/S Post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45002089
800.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> Especially that like half of the web runs on Java Source? W3 seems to think its more like ~5% https://w3techs.com/technologies/comparison/pl-java
801.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
The biggest capacity HD available today is 30TB. 17PB = about 567 of those drives... being totally filled... per day. I was hoping somebody would come and say this is a simple spelling error or something. The cost of the drives alone seems
802.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
If you want 3x 4k monitors, you need to care how good the GPU is.
803.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
You dont run an IDE with indexing, error checking and code completion?
804.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> sometimes with 8GB RAM Apple have long thought that 8Gb ram is good enough for anything, and will continue to for some time now.
805.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> I raised the issue with my manager and the corporate IT team. > And of course myself and my team took the blame for not preparing ahead of time. If your initial request was not logged and then able to be retrieved by yourself in def
806.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> but most (really all) employees are in it for money Yes, but some also have a moral conscience and were brought up to not take more than they need. If you are not one of these types of people, then not taking complete over advantage of
807.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> Like you say, it's not really a gray area. It's a feature not a bug. Luckily that comes down to the policy of the individual company and is not enforced by law. I am personally happy to pay engineers more so they can buy this
808.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
If they care that much about compile time, they would work on a desktop instead of a laptop.
809.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
Doesnt matter, some people just want whatever the company will spring for them.
810.
▲
by
alt227
1y ago
> 17 PB/day Are they really generating data at this scale? I cant even imagine a system which creates and stores this much data this fast.
More ›