Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alt227
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
301.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
For example, It was recently let loose on cURL and its maintainer is less than impressed: https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/11/anthropics-b...
302.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Becasue Palantir pinky promised to be good in a consultation meeting.
303.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
This just sounds like 'We have too many systems, so lets build another one to solve the problem!" https://xkcd.com/927/
304.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
> Are you a fool for not finding the ones in yours? If I have a company which sells a paid product, and my paid engineers do not find bugs then I absolutely do not expect the public to willfully and freely make my product better for me.
305.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
> You’re right to an action or belief doesn’t make it inherently good The fact you are randomly calling people trash supports your theory!
306.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Again, for how long? The answers to all the questions seems to be the same. If Bitwarden was sold they could remove all of this free functionality and interoperability with 3rd party clients immediately. Then you could say well Vaultwarden
307.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
The problem is once Vaultwarden clients appear, then Vaultwarden becomes its own complete system and is no longer able to rely on the good reputation of Bitwarden. Plus developing clients for multiple browsers and OSes is a lot more difficu
308.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
If you are talking about some open source project then I would fully agree. But when it comes to money making corporations then personally I dont agree that revealing flaws in their product comes into ethics at all. A companies paid product
309.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
When their 'common decency' is directly benefiting a money making corporation with shareholders and directors then yes they should definitely get some money out of it.
310.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
> If I doctor performed a cancer screening on me, for free and without me asking But that would never happen, so the point is moot.
311.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Vaultwarden relies on the goodwill of Bitwarden to allow it to use its clients for compatibility. I would wager a new owner looking for money would block that pretty soon after buying the company.
312.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
How long after a public sale will Bitwarden clients keep compatible with Vaultwarden? The new owners could put a check in all clients on the first day of ownership if they wanted, and Vaultwarden would immediately be obselete and useless.
313.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Multiple people who have already used Mythos or been given its reports on their software have publicly stated that it's all hype, and that it is not really finding any new critical bugs which other models cant.
314.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
It sounds like a genuine attack vector to me. If someone hacked say teslas firmware supply chain and made all chargers pull max power at the same time, it could be a national infrastructure crippling attack.
315.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Why would they sue themselves?
316.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Its not about them having to support multiple 3rd party backends, its about them not making any hostile changes which actively block them.
317.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
> But you can run the same software on your server at home if you want, for free. Whats to say this will still be true if the company gets sold?
318.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
> This is about China. From what your saying it sounds more about Tariffs
319.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
> I just have a better social circle This is very subjective. You can have your own opinions, but its really important to remember everybody has a right to their own too.
320.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Yes I am aware, however that still does not stop anybody examining your commits and diffs to find vulnerabilities. Do you assume ai will just stop at a certain level? Or is it possible that it will keep increasing in intelligence? If the la
321.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
The point is that even if all code commits are scanned as safe by ai, black hats can still analyse the commits and diffs to find vulnerabilites for people who havent patched yet. Scanning every commit doesnt automatically make everyone in
322.
▲
by
alt227
5mo ago
Just copy and paste the parent post into $yourFavouriteLLM and ask it to make a blog post for you to read about it. No need to ask the author to do more work than is necessary /s
323.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
If as a developer all you want your job to be is checking ai generated PRs then this is a great step!
324.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
> What I found most often How did you find this?
325.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
Maybe something like this? AI agent calls a human on their phone (even engage in an email chain), whilst talking to the human they analyse the likelyhood of diffferent fraud vectors, and choose the most likely one to work on this particular
326.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
But how long until those children are no longer in nursery and you are not subsedised for it? In ~2 years you will no longer have this help, you will be paying through the nose for the outstanding amount on your new car, and your take home
327.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
This is the intended end result of capitalism, maybe its time we all gave socialism another chance?
328.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
Probably someone famous and powerful saw somebody do it on an Android phone and complained to someone high up in Apple.
329.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
Google wallet has done this from day one. If Apple had done the same these 3rd party apps would have never existed in the first place.
330.
▲
by
alt227
6mo ago
Not much, it just allows you to save it in your wallet app instead of your photo app.
More ›