alpple

7 ms·

31.
by alpple 6y ago
It could be that more complex phenomenon don't have a simple explanation. It could be that they do. But, just because I would like a why, doesn't mean that there is one. (Personally I think there is a why.)
32.
by alpple 6y ago
I think people confuse having state of the art knowledge of nutrition with knowing how all of nutrition works. There may be good arguements that this is safe, but history will decide that.
33.
by alpple 6y ago
I think the optimal or universal language is more difficult in practice than in idealism. Reading is the art of sorting through the mess in any field, and acquiring context. I think a lot of this underestimates the complexity and nuance o
34.
by alpple 6y ago
Can you tell me what you have in mind about where others left off, because I'd be interested in reading about freedom.
35.
by alpple 6y ago
Why do we accept .999... as a valid notation. Why not only allow 1 to denote this concept?
36.
by alpple 6y ago
Should they ban religious and spiritual videos too? Who decides what is real? Are ideas the coming warground? These questions sound dramatic, but I wonder about this stuff.
37.
by alpple 7y ago
Good point.
38.
by alpple 7y ago
How large of a group of people should be able to have secrets? (although I agree, I'm trying to understand this more objectively)
39.
by alpple 7y ago
LSD may have unearthed Olson's conscience, which doesn't mesh well will having been involved in human torture. I think LSD may be the opposite of mind control. ( I don't think it's safe though )