Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alphan0n
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Pro-Palestinian usage of the slur coined by David Duke on Twitter is a clue there.
62.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
That hasn’t been my experience at all. Could you share some examples? > As of February 14, 2025, the latest version of Chakra UI for React is 3.8.0, released on February 9, 2025. This release introduced new hooks such as useElementRec
63.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Seeding can be trivially faked to trackers. https://github.com/slundi/RatioUp https://github.com/anthonyraymond/joal http://ratiomaster.net/ The smallest amount of seeding possibl
64.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
The only way for links to appear in a Google search would be to host a public resource, that is linked from another public resource. If you have specified in your robots.txt that you do not want the page(s) or directories ingested then only
65.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Would melting frozen water be considered wet water? Seems to satisfy the requirements.
66.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
The API might be a good place to start. I’m on mobile at the moment so I haven’t been able to dig too deep, but here’s [0] a query that returns the metadata for everything modified since Jan 1st (add more rows at the end if it’s cut off). I
67.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
I wouldn’t expect any truthful AI to answer definitively on matters that amount to opinions of genocide at this point.
68.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Yes, the FindYou project [0] has shown this to be possible. [0] https://github.com/positive-security/find-you
69.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Soo.. gold stars?
70.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
> b) Works Made for Hire. >In the case of a work made for hire, the employer or other person for whom the work was prepared is considered the author for purposes of this title, and, unless the parties have expressly agreed otherwise i
71.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
I almost got taken in by a fake parking ticket scam, perfect ticket/envelope, the url printed on the ticket led to a 404 on the legitimate city website, the QR code led to a very convincing website/url, especially on mobile. The o
72.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Quote the full passage of copyright law that backs any of your claims up.
73.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
My point isn’t adversarial, we most likely (in my most humble opinion) “learn” the same way as anything learns. That is to say, we are not unique in terms of understanding, “understandings”. Are the ballistics we learn by physical interacti
74.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
You are saying that, any output is possibly infringing, dependandant on the input. This is actually, factually, verifiably, false, in terms of current copyright law. No human, in the current epoch of education where copyright has been
75.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Startup > trapt (archaic) us
76.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
This is a common misconception. You mean the author. The creator of a commissioned work is the author under copyright law, the owner or copyright “holder” is the commissioner of the work or employer of the employee that created the work as
77.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Old men looking at a child with training wheels and sneering that they’ll never ever be able to ride a bike.
78.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
If that’s the case, then sure, as I said in the first sentence of my comment, verbatim copies of copyrighted works would most likely constitute infringement.
79.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Copyright law is pretty clear on commissioned work, you are the holder, if your employee violated copyright and you failed to do your due diligence before publication, then you are responsible. If your employee violated copyright and fraudu
80.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
If the output of a mathematical model trained on an aggregate of knowledge that contains copyrighted material is derivative and infringing, then ipso facto, all works since the inception of copyright are derivative and infringing. You learn
81.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Can you do that though? Just ask ChatGPT to give you the first chapter of a book and it gives it to you?
82.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Right, but the onus of responsibility being on the end user publishing the song or creative work in violation of copyright, not the text editor, word processor, musical notation software, etc, correct? A text prediction tool isn’t a person,
83.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Right, strictly speaking, the vast majority of copyright infringement falls under liability tort. There are cases where infringement by negligence that could be argued, but as long as there is clear effort to prevent copying in the output o
84.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Simply put, if the model isn’t producing an actual copy, they aren’t violating copyright (in the US) under any current definition. As much as people bandy the term around, copyright has never applied to input, and the output of a tool is th
85.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Apologies, I’m not affiliated with Amazon in any way. I meant the Amazon ip addresses that are causing you trouble so I can preemptively block them.
86.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Can you share the list of offending ip’s, here or your website so we can use them in block lists? Also, there is an email to contact: amazonbot@amazon.com
87.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Have you verified that they are actually Amazon crawlers as outlined here: https://developer.amazon.com/amazonbot
88.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
This was just posed as a hypothetical, not something that actually happened. It would also require that the person asking about salary information already have access to said data. Full quote: > "Particularly around bigger companies
89.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
Cheering on deportation.. I wonder what modern parallels we can draw from that.
90.
▲
by
alphan0n
2y ago
> I read that somewhere that during WWII when people were sent to the gas chambers, crowds would be cheering on. Citation needed. The execution of Jews by gas chamber during the holocaust was not a public event.
More ›