almostnormal

11 ms·

1. 241.▲
   by almostnormal 4y ago

   It's not Microsofts fault if customers use it to store GDPR relevant data. It's Microsofts customers using them as an external data processor. It's the companies that are using O356 for such data that will get fined.
2. 242.▲
   by almostnormal 4y ago

   A few billion is no problem. Simply collect the GDPR defined maximum fine of 4% of total global revenue from Microsoft, and use that to build the alternative. Provide that solution for self-hosting, so the cost of the infrastructure is paye
3. 243.▲
   by almostnormal 4y ago

   Fast forward to 2022. I feel the problem has been inverted. It is no longer about losing information by lack of or ignoring a warning, today it is about creating information where none should be created. Example 1: In better times, dialogs
4. 244.▲
   by almostnormal 4y ago

   The EU isn't "the" EU. The GDPR was created by the elected representatives of the EU citizens. The EU commission consisting of representatives of the EU member state's governments are giving away the data.
5. 245.▲
   by almostnormal 4y ago

   Sorry, I missed that point about EV, I didn't expect OBD-Ii PIDs and EV in the same sentence.
6. 246.▲
   by almostnormal 4y ago

   What happened with GDPR: Some small independent hobby bbs/forums got worried, closed down, and members moved their discussions to facebook.
7. 247.▲
   by almostnormal 4y ago

   For the daily cost to rent the webserver Elon Musk could hire an entire department of developers and purchase a data center to make the website actually work.