almosnow

12 ms·

61.
by almosnow 13y ago
It just says OpenSSL
62.
by almosnow 13y ago
Oh sorry, 'apt-get' has spoiled me (somehow I've never knew what was the official home of openssl). Not cool at all, and apparently the guys running the site haven't took notice yet.
63.
by almosnow 13y ago
Is this the site that offered you free SSL certs?
64.
by almosnow 13y ago
you guys will be acquired by imgur
65.
by almosnow 13y ago
On a side issue, that kind of sucks too, subscriptions are cool, let's see how they get implemented over bitcoin. Probably you could authorize your wallet holder to deduct a certanin amount each month.
66.
by almosnow 13y ago
mine
67.
by almosnow 13y ago
Just tell him, plain and square: "When we started on this endeavour I was expecting you to behave/provide/take care of X and you are not doing those things that we agreed on (or the results you are delivering are WAY OFF the
68.
by almosnow 13y ago
b... but how do they work?
69.
by almosnow 13y ago
this
70.
by almosnow 13y ago
hahaha
71.
by almosnow 13y ago
Nice info you got there. It surprises me the "be profitable by 2015" plan. Square has a front row seat at money, I would've probably bet that they were profitable from day one. Can you shed some light on to why they are still
72.
by almosnow 13y ago
"this solution will definitely work in practice"
73.
by almosnow 13y ago
>You could just stop staring at your iPhone before you fall asleep? There's this big problem with technology - particularly common with people that is not familiar with it (looking at you @aroch) - where people think that you should
74.
by almosnow 13y ago
You get root access to your phone/pad, that alone is definitely worth it (spec. if you're a developer); sometimes you just NEED a shell.
75.
by almosnow 13y ago
I'm sorry but in my world a White Knight is an amorphous (and obviously genderless) entity that bears any kind of armor (not just the shiny ones!) and saves other amorphous entities in distress. Please consider revising your definition
76.
by almosnow 13y ago
On a totally unrelated comment, the article is missing the White Knight: Someone that's more worried about the overall problems of justice and fairness than from the job he's suppossed to do. E.g.: I'm sorry, I refuse to name
77.
by almosnow 13y ago
>The past is the future in the Arcanists’ worldview [...] Hahaha, loved that!
78.
by almosnow 13y ago
What are 'happines hero'es ?
79.
by almosnow 13y ago
Honest question. Why does weather behave different over oceans when compared to land?
80.
by almosnow 13y ago
Didn't knew of that article, thanks. Nice one but yeah it kind of sucks that the theory is used like a preamble for trying to sell you LINQ
81.
by almosnow 13y ago
Same thing... Have you seen American Psycho? (Of course you have...) I always had this 'alternate theory' that the movie is about how the top of society can pretty much do as they please.
82.
by almosnow 13y ago
Yup, while the misoginy is more than evident, I agree with you that the root of evil there is their desire to make their shows as profitable as possible.
83.
by almosnow 13y ago
IMHO and probably limited experience, all data problems as data size and concurrency approaches infinite become the same problem, and that problem is more easily solved with a KVS rather than with infinite RDB tables. To me, KVS and RDB are
84.
by almosnow 13y ago
Haha, haven't seen the news lately? Check out what happened w/ node, also the guy that made the 'dongle' joke.
85.
by almosnow 13y ago
I disagree with articles (and people) that are written like this. Reminds me of how burecrautized the sector can be. 99% of database deployments are made by a guy like this and they are hell on earth (thousands of tables, 20+ recursive join
86.
by almosnow 13y ago
> ... or continuing their other illegal activities and get taken down by the police. Yeah sure, just as they are being taken down right now. Haha, they even made you consider to change the laws on their favor (yeah, if you think you came
87.
by almosnow 13y ago
Vicente Fox is a shareholder and the public image of one of the first 'entrepenurial' companies that plan to distribute marijuana at a major scale... So yeah, that argument is kind of: 'but George Clooney said that I should b
88.
by almosnow 13y ago
Ok wow, I didn't knew that the proportion of inmates related would be that high! I didn't make my homework hehe. But drug cartels will still be part of the picture; with police out of the way they would have one less thing to worr
89.
by almosnow 13y ago
You will still buy from the major drug dealers; they will own the shops, c'mon...
90.
by almosnow 13y ago
Legal drugs != less crime... On one hand, yeah sure, some people won't end up in jail for buying/selling/consuming drugs but those are just like little drops in the sea. The sea is actually the major criminal organizations th

More ›