allthatglitters

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by allthatglitters 12y ago

   I wonder if this had anything to do with it? Interesting application that would carry a few links... http://www.droptalk.us/
2. 32.▲
   by allthatglitters 12y ago

   Interesting that your comment was voted down! How many backers have ever done any spectroscopy? For that matter, how many of those commenting here have done any serious spectroscopy? I have to agree, this seems very misleading.
3. 33.▲
   Google Glass and Pitch Track

   1 points by allthatglitters 12y ago|0 comments
4. 34.▲
   by allthatglitters 13y ago

   One might also say that it's a "temporary" perpetual motion machine...
5. 35.▲
   by allthatglitters 13y ago

   Having read quite a bit of Dan, I'd have to say this is terribly tongue-in-cheek. I hope I'm not wrong...
6. 36.▲
   by allthatglitters 13y ago

   This article supports many of the common fallacies that accompany most discussions of "wealth inequality" - and as usual believes it should be rectified... (by whom?) For a refreshing point of view on this topic, read http:&#x2F
7. 37.▲
   The perfect con game(cafehayek.com)

   2 points by allthatglitters 13y ago|0 comments
8. 38.▲
   by allthatglitters 13y ago

   Cinnamon (a Gnome variant of pleasing minimalism) on Wheezy.
9. 39.▲
   by allthatglitters 13y ago

   Given two choices (equal probability; redundant?) - which is the case once you have two doors - switching cannot change the odds. Have someone flip a coin. Call it. But before the flipper looks at the coin - (whether he KNOWS the result or