alganet

15 ms·

241.
by alganet 1y ago
Zizek also puts ideology in that realm of unknown knowns.
242.
by alganet 1y ago
What is the other part of your goal?
243.
by alganet 1y ago
What patterns emerge when you represent primes spatially?
244.
by alganet 1y ago
I see. I guarantee you that if AGI happens, it won't happen that way. No need to worry.
245.
by alganet 1y ago
Repeating the thing I just challenged won't make it a better argument. If anything, it makes it worse.
246.
by alganet 1y ago
> Evolution is brute force by any other name. No, it's not.
247.
by alganet 1y ago
> talent doesn’t feel like you’re amazing. It feels like the difficulties that trouble others are mysteriously absent in your case There's a problem: money. If you have lots of it, you have less difficulties than others in many, man
248.
by alganet 1y ago
Coding++ Seriously now, I think the whole industry suffers from too many buzzwords and whacky terminology. *The job hasn't changed*. As mentioned, all those things from the past are still the most important thing (version control, bein
249.
by alganet 1y ago
> Why do you think we have fully self driving cars instead of just more simplistic beacon systems? While the self-driving car industry aims to replace all humans with machines, I don't think this is the case with browser automation.
250.
by alganet 1y ago
It matters a lot for E2E testing. I would totally replace the ease of the AI solution for a faster, more complicated one if it starts impacting build times. Few things are more frustrating for a team than maintaining a slow E2E browser test
251.
by alganet 1y ago
I am curious. Why do you think controlling an OS (and not just a browser) would be a move towards AGI?
252.
by alganet 1y ago
> It seems to me that people think AI is somehow magic. That's because it is marketed as magic. It's marketed as magic so people will adopt the thing before knowing its shortcomings. https://pbfcomics.com/comics
253.
by alganet 1y ago
I don't understand how this can work. Can you make me a quick demonstration using a publicly available model and the dbpedia SPARQL endpoint? https://dbpedia.org/sparql
254.
by alganet 1y ago
The purpose of RDF is to enable reasoning ("I'm sharing this with you, and I'm also sharing how to reason about this thing I shared with you, so we can all reason about it the same way"). If you show me an LLM that can t
255.
by alganet 1y ago
Whatever relevance it has, it's more than microformats. I personally think semweb-related technologies could play a significant and productive role in synthetic data generation, but that's a whole different conversation that is be
256.
by alganet 1y ago
This is dead. If you need something similar, better look for RDFa instead.
257.
by alganet 1y ago
Maybe you can have discussions with a chatbot instead. They always agree with you.
258.
by alganet 1y ago
> For example, a significant amount of fibre optic capacity was built in the 1990s during the telecoms bubble, which remained unlit for years Also, a lot of AOL CDs were printed, which remained useless forever. I'm having trouble th
259.
by alganet 1y ago
Developers, developers, developers! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fcSviC7cRM&t=34s
260.
by alganet 1y ago
They no longer reflect what the average user expects their browser to support. You can pass it and miss on several important things that are considered widespread features nowadays.
261.
by alganet 1y ago
> Of course the problem is that most chatbots aren't smart. But this is a purely technical problem that can be solved within foreseeable future. Ah yes, it's just a small detail. Don't worry about it.
262.
by alganet 1y ago
It all comes down to doing things you don't want to do. Procrastination as a concept exists to trick you into thinking that you should want to do the thing you don't want to do. It's much better to just recognize that there&#
263.
by alganet 1y ago
No, you don't do that. You do exactly the opposite, you make it surprisingly neutral and reasonable so it gets praise and widespread use. Then, you introduce the bias into relative unknown concepts that no one prompts for. Preferrably,
264.
by alganet 1y ago
> Finally. I presented that statement in my first comment. It is still there, unedited. I also pointed to it several times. There was a choice to focus on the opinion-based stuff or the technical stuff. Other users pointed out that thi
265.
by alganet 1y ago
> The disagreement may just be about how significant that triage step is. Whether it is important or not is highly subjective. My statement is that _the quality is capped by the non-AI portion of the solution_, which is an objective stat
266.
by alganet 1y ago
> Several people have written lengthy, detailed responses to your questions. No, they haven't. Just read the thread. > You're partly right that credentials alone don't prove anything. I am totally right. Saying "be
267.
by alganet 1y ago
No, there aren't. There is open source training and inference software. And there are open weights. Those things are not enough to reproduce the training. Even if you had the hardware, you would not be able to recreate llama (for examp
268.
by alganet 1y ago
Copyright is a nightmare. It's just that it sounds like a gentler nightmare than hyperscaled algorithms controlled by a few.
269.
by alganet 1y ago
You forgot to mention that if things continue as they are, a very small group of people will have complete control over this giant library.
270.
by alganet 1y ago
Irrelevant. I actually started by describing the system, which was my first comment on the post. I am not responsible for anyone that gets offended if I say that something is not as AI as it seems to be. It's obviously not a personal o

More ›