alganet

40 ms·

901.
by alganet 1y ago
Most of my argument is not about safety. My only mention of it is in _rethorical questions_ that expose the issue of feasibility, which you tried to bring it as a novelty without noticing I already made that point. Go back, read again. When
902.
by alganet 1y ago
I am glad we agree on the unfeasibility of the issue. Now, catch up on the remaining of the argument. You only touched my first paragraph. I expected more.
903.
by alganet 1y ago
What is your solution? If you're just gonna interject, I don't need your comment.
904.
by alganet 1y ago
Of course not, bigger risk. And I'm not talking about fear. I said hype.
905.
by alganet 1y ago
So, it's unfeasible to either prove or disprove its safety. Claiming there is no scientific basis then is doubly irrelevant, in addition to laws often not requiring scientific studies to be passed. It sounds like it's trying to fo
906.
by alganet 1y ago
It sounds like a cheap cash grab to capitalize on the hype. I like the title, it sounds humorous.
907.
by alganet 1y ago
Let's be constructive then. Do we have science to support that internet in its current state is safe? What do we need to understand it? Is it even in the realm of feasibility? There is a lot of media articles about the dangers of socia
908.
by alganet 1y ago
Any study about nicotine should be taken with an extra grain of salt. There is always a chance something is financed by the tobacco industry. I think it's dangerous to portray nicotine as a cognitive enhancer. Even when that portrayal
909.
by alganet 1y ago
I don't think there is anything to discuss about Decartes.
910.
by alganet 1y ago
Do you consider yourself blind to economic issues? Rich or poor? Straight question.
911.
by alganet 1y ago
It doesn't matter. It's Decartes demon all over again. Problem solved centuries ago. You can skin it however you want, it's the same problem.
912.
by alganet 1y ago
That's the least important part of my statement. There is a struggle between those who have power and those who don't. This displacement creates blind spots, and also vantage points.
913.
by alganet 1y ago
Warfare is dumb. The class struggle is a perspective. It points to how blind rich people are to social issues, and how blind the poor are to economic issues. These two need the struggle, gently. Without it, there is either bloody revolution
914.
by alganet 1y ago
Once a funny little story to make you small and think outside the box. Now, it's just cannon fodder for a platform obsessed by AI. It's a shame.
915.
by alganet 1y ago
I see, thanks for the correction.
916.
by alganet 1y ago
Any sufficiently large amount of information exchange could be interpreted as computational if you see it as separated parts. It doesn't mean that it is intrinsically computational. Seeing human interactions as computer-like is a side
917.
by alganet 1y ago
Contradictions are normal. Humans make them all the time. They're even easy to induce, due to the simplistic nature of our communication (lots of ambiguities, semantic disputes, etc). I don't see how that's a problem. Subject
918.
by alganet 1y ago
Honestly, it reminds me of "All Tomorrows" by C. M. Kosemen. The "emotions" part is kind of tongue-in-cheek. I think emotional responses are one of the more mechanical parts of a human being. Ability to demonstrate empat
919.
by alganet 1y ago
Media likes to give itself some treats for being so vital to society. Just a little wrong here or there in the name of profit to ease the heavy burden of having the power to shape opinion.
920.
by alganet 1y ago
Humans also often get lost in multi-turn conversation. I have experienced that in person many, many times. Jumps in context that seem easy for one person to follow, but very hard for others. So, assuming the paper is legit (arxiv, you never
921.
by alganet 1y ago
Anti-cop is anti-government. It's the same thing. Both newer audiences were blinded in several spots and are prevented by group speech to acknowledge some realities. I'm not from the USA, so I see things from a vantage point. I&#x
922.
by alganet 1y ago
The separation of the left into an intellectual elite and a mass following is largely part of the domestication effect I was talking about. The mere suggestion of a caste of "the intelligent leftist" is a cultural grenade designed
923.
by alganet 1y ago
I don't understand your reply. The book seems to be a cheap cash grab designed to monetize on the "cops are mean and corrupt" rethoric. It's the modern equivalent of a wallet with the silk screened face of Che Guevara on
924.
by alganet 1y ago
From my perspective, the kind of loss expected with LLMs does not reveal itself in one generation. What you described is more akin to laziness than loss of knowledge. It is also a trap. Your text is almost satirical to the notion that AI co
925.
by alganet 1y ago
Open free catalog, open free software, training on cheap commodity hardware. It needs those three things to unlock that sweet free crowd talent pool of volunteers and curious learners that have been at the core of IT innovation for decades.
926.
by alganet 1y ago
There's nothing wrong with continuous learning. I knew that before choosing this career. The issue with recent AI tech is that _I can't learn it_. I have to pay a lot of money (GPU renting or buying outrageous rigs) if I want to d
927.
by alganet 1y ago
I didn't knew about it. Honestly, it doesn't take a genius or religion to figure out that human connection and good counseling are good things. However, I despise the analytical part of it. It sounds like made up stuff. Anyway, &q
928.
by alganet 1y ago
"you are a lunatic BECAUSE you're opinion is invalid" (translates to: you are being unreasonable). Not ad hominen. is different from "you are a lunatic THEREFORE your opinion is invalid" (translates to: I think your
929.
by alganet 1y ago
Non-AI therapy is already the product of mind experimentation ultra-idealists. "Head shape measuring madmen". It has been neutered and reformed into some kind of counseling, but not completely, and it can become feral and discrimi
930.
by alganet 1y ago
> Sources speaking to The Verge are convinced [...] Paranoid schizophrenics are also often convinced they're Napoleon, just saying. There must be some solid journalism behind the article to confirm those sources, I imagine. Is there

More ›