Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alganet
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
391.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
> Is the internet broken beyond repair? Depends on who's asking!
392.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
From a "matriarchical society" perspective, that wouldn't be my problem to solve or even think of. Power implies responsibility. In that frame of reference, the article is a jab to other women, which makes HN a poor audienc
393.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I'm asking in a problem-solving context. The "low hanging fruit" therefore, has no immediate value. It's just a smaller part of the problem that is more obvious and easy to reach. It could set up some movement in a virtu
394.
▲
Ask HN: Do you always go for low hanging fruits first?
1 points
by
alganet
1y ago
|
2 comments
395.
▲
Ask HN: Have you ever waited for a project to be launched but it never did?
4 points
by
alganet
1y ago
|
3 comments
396.
▲
Ask HN: What is the worst development limbo you ever faced?
2 points
by
alganet
1y ago
|
0 comments
397.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
You're talking about decompiling. It's a specialization of reverse engineering. I already gave a good example. Simplistic probe queries to detect if something uses regex are a very primitive technique of reverse engineering (re-co
398.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
So, for example, the machine can predict "a hammer" but can't figure out if it's connected to the justice system or fixing a loose wooden plate. That seems very low resolution and brittle. Simple sleight of hand magician
399.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Is this remote viewing really a thing? I thought it was a misdirection play.
400.
▲
Ask HN: What are your reverse engineering skills?
2 points
by
alganet
1y ago
|
2 comments
401.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
You're looking for a fight. There's nothing regarding individuality in that.
402.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Superman is the Joker from Batman's perspective (dressed like a clown, always with a smile on the face, etc). Batman is Lex Luthor from Superman's perspective (rich, creates megalomaniacal inventions and gizmos). This movie corrup
403.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
They don't. Non-human beings from another world? Neither me or governments believe in that. UFO: Just something unidentified that flies (or flew). UAP: Re-definition to support unidentified objects that do not specifically "fly&qu
404.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
The way you describe it make PRISM sound like a contact book. I think it more like unwilling facebook.
405.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Companies can change hands easier than governments. I would assume the US isn't sharing anything exclusive with private commercial entities. Doing so would be a mistake in my opinion.
406.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
> I'm currently working in consultancy. Please, clarify. How does this is supposed to influence the answer? (In other words: how is this relevant to what you're asking?) > multiple teams distributed across various domains an
407.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
It doesn't say anything about open training corpus of data. The USA supposedly have the most data in the world. Companies cannot (in theory) train on integrated sets of information. USA and China to some extent, can train on large amou
408.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I don't understand what you are saying. Is it some elaboration on "It's useless, humans are better, therefore stop trying to collect data?". If it is, it is more of an assertion than a question. Those are rather common,
409.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I feel like you're not willing to admit you made a mistake.
410.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
> It was not an awful initial concept, but it was neither well thought-through nor well-presented. I am looking forward to discussing such matters with people that are less compelled to observe style before content. I don't have th
411.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I'm not hiring, sorry.
412.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I don't quite understand your point. What is this "God In The Gaps" thing you mention?
413.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
> Combining unrelated information without any reasoning I estabilished a loose correlation that does not imply cause (they all happened roughly at the same time). It seems you assumed what I was thinking by the writing style. A common mi
414.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I took the vaccines because I trust them. I'm talking about not suffering consequences of the virus because I decided to receive some immunization. However, I was skeptical about mixing different vaccine types, so I took only one kin
415.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Do you believe the terms "neurological" and "psychological" are interchangeable?
416.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
It seems you misread my comment profoundly. I never dismissed any actual biological causes. It's ok, lots of people do this mistake. A more critical look would notice that I was only questioning aspects of the phenomena that are curren
417.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Perhaps you are right. I took the vaccines and was pretty lucky to not suffer any major consequences. What I said could be read as offensive and some kind of "your own fault" to laymen. However, that is not the idea. I have psycho
418.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
That's very original but not the kind of thing I proposed. I am sure there are many ways one could be disconnected from reality.
419.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Do you think I was talking about the sense of smell?
420.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
The very fact that you are hypothesizing about my intentions is, in fact, an act of asking questions on its own. You are worried that I might be suggesting some form of conspiracy, but these worries are all in your head. There is uncertaint
More ›