Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alblue
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
421.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
s/average person/average American/
422.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
This article really demonstrates the level of idiocy that armchair experts contribute to the discussion. It's as if the author had to publish a piece on the disappearance and use it to generate as many click bait responses as possible.
423.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
You should provide what kind of location or travel budget that you are asking about: there's great conferences across Europe but that may not be of interest if you are based on the West coast of the states for example.
424.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
I've been working with Cocoa for 20 years, back from the NeXT days. I certainly see where Swift is going, and there's a possibility that it will surpass Objective-C in the future, but for the time being they will live together in
425.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
I wrote about the format of git trees (and other object types) here: http://alblue.bandlem.com/2011/08/git-tip-of-week-trees.html
426.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
The page kept refreshing automatically every second and it adds no interesting points to what was widely known about shell shock in the days after the event.
427.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
Note that Apple has not provided updates for older systems. If you have an older system and wish to patch, I have been keeping my blog post [1] updated along with the canonical StackExchange answer [2]. Note that the patch from Apple allows
428.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
This is basically a copy of my post at http://alblue.bandlem.com and of my stack exchange answer.
429.
▲
ShellShocked – behind the bug
(infoq.com)
2 points
by
alblue
12y ago
|
1 comments
430.
▲
by
alblue
12y ago
Simon is also the creator of the popular windows ssh package, putty.
431.
▲
by
alblue
13y ago
> I mean, to be fair, your argument was "large enterprises". > Which, means Java. And in that regard you're not wrong since > binary compatibility there is a given. Exactly, and that's what Scala is up against.
432.
▲
by
alblue
13y ago
I spent a long time trying to get the issue raised back in 2009. http://alblue.bandlem.com/2009/08/modularity-for-scala.html http://alblue.bandlem.com/2009/09/draft-scala-modularity-req..
433.
▲
by
alblue
13y ago
Just FYI; semantic versioning is split into three numbers: major.minor.micro Changes in .micro are assumed to be interchangeable. Scala does this. Changes in .minor are assumed to be backwardly compatible, but with new features added. Scala
434.
▲
by
alblue
13y ago
You can't take a library compiled with Scala 2.8 and have it run with Scala 2.10. You can take a library compiled with Java 1.4 and have it run with Java 7. That's the key point that is made here. The fact that version compatibili
435.
▲
by
alblue
13y ago
It's not inflammatory for the sake of it; the point is I wrote about this four years ago: http://alblue.bandlem.com/2009/10/scala-is-still-not-enterpr... and there has been very little change since that 2009