albedoa

10 ms·

151.
by albedoa 11mo ago
This is some fascinating insight. Do you think that the things being compared are [homeschooling] and [fighting grizzlies]?
152.
by albedoa 11mo ago
Yeah this is weird. It's against the rules to speculate about whether a commenter read the article, but what about the title of the article?
153.
by albedoa 11mo ago
Perfectly said, bravo! To add to all of this, the "perception bias" argument falls apart when we consider that if Mozilla had done the good alternative this case, the very example that we are discussing — if they had made a pledge
154.
by albedoa 11mo ago
> Just the UK? Well not just the UK, but the comment you are replying to is about the UK. > Seems a little inconsistent, this delivery of Democracy. Ya. Also not a claim that the comment is countering. As a reminder of where you are i
155.
by albedoa 11mo ago
Same. This is completely foreign to me: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45797794 It's the conclusions of someone whose understanding of America is formed entirely from television.
156.
by albedoa 1y ago
Others are giving you too much benefit. Without looking it up, can you tell us who "levelsio" is? How do you think you know about him?
157.
by albedoa 1y ago
Did you mean to type "does not" in that first sentence? Otherwise, the rest of your comment acts as evidence against it.
158.
by albedoa 1y ago
Nobody is reading the parent comment that way. You might be reading it wrong, but in a different way that misses the specific window fantasy.
159.
by albedoa 1y ago
> Just saying, once you find out the testing team is unreliable, you make sure there's a form of evidence it actually got tested Once you find out the heart surgeon shows up drunk to the operating room, you make sure there is an add
160.
by albedoa 1y ago
Okay! That is a wild thing to admit!
161.
by albedoa 1y ago
The HN comments for that first one gave us the worst "advice" that this site has ever seen and might ever see [1]: > Nothing that is visible "below the fold" should ever run or load until the page is scrolled down by
162.
by albedoa 1y ago
Engagement.
163.
by albedoa 1y ago
> The fact that you single out .reduce() here is really telling to me. .reduce() definitely has a learning curve to it, but once you're used to it the resulting code is generally much simpler and the immutability of it is much less
164.
by albedoa 1y ago
> Of course you don't get it: you're not autistic. Did you expect to get it? Am I missing where the person you are replying to identified as non-autistic?
165.
by albedoa 1y ago
Ah, you're constructively accusing the author of "[leaving] out a whole lot of context". Non-derogatorily.
166.
by albedoa 1y ago
> a comment about someone's husband [...] applying for jobs Now we're wondering which comment you read.
167.
by albedoa 1y ago
I don't think you meant to reply to me.
168.
by albedoa 1y ago
> It doesn’t add any value. You don't speak for us. If you are going to demand supporting evidence for obvious statements, then you can present supporting evidence for your spurious claims about value.
169.
by albedoa 1y ago
What on earth are you talking about. An employer can do that in any state, not just the "right to work" ones.
170.
by albedoa 1y ago
Holy shit you weren't kidding: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
171.
by albedoa 1y ago
> Nah… I mean, I believe you, but the person you are replying to obviously believes that they are similar. Could you explain the significant differences?
172.
by albedoa 1y ago
I'm on the phone with Merriam-Webster right now to let them know that internet user aldousd666 thinks it's a conspiracy. We're pulling a team together and sending investigators to your house. You are scheduled for "Good
173.
by albedoa 1y ago
Dude. That ignores one half of the analysis that we are discussing here.
174.
by albedoa 1y ago
I appreciate your sensible and articulate responses here.
175.
by albedoa 1y ago
> In this case, the whole "it want off by itself" claim was a lie. This might be true, but nowhere in the article you posted does it say that.
176.
by albedoa 1y ago
You are really having a normal one huh.
177.
by albedoa 1y ago
Oh ya? If I am willing to pay my cleaner $350, but she only charges and accepted an offer of $200, I am engaging in the definition of wage suppression?
178.
by albedoa 1y ago
Yes. The person you are responding to doesn't quite understand the comment they are responding to :) The rake can turn a breakeven or even winning player into a losing player. That's what we mean.
179.
by albedoa 1y ago
[flagged]
180.
by albedoa 1y ago
You did not answer the question. You repeatedly dodged it while blaming your "wording" (?) on your failure to answer it. It's right there for all of us to see. Now despite your previous admission, you are here telling me th

More ›