albedoa

31 ms·

451.
by albedoa 6y ago
https://www.sitepoint.com/optimizing-css-id-selectors-and-ot... The slowest and most convoluted selector took 21ms when tested against 50,000 elements using a 2014 MacBook Pro.
452.
by albedoa 6y ago
> Everyone already hated and was avoiding flash at that point. Which point do you mean? 2007 or 2010? Flash was more popular than it had ever been when the iPhone was released, and the iPhone had been without Flash for three years when J
453.
by albedoa 6y ago
That this comment is still up five days later, and amidst the current news, is a shocking failure by the mods. What an embarrassment.
454.
by albedoa 6y ago
Why is this comment allowed to stay up?
455.
by albedoa 6y ago
Another expression of your stereotype: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23360585
456.
by albedoa 6y ago
Which makes their confidence in their literacy so bizarre. koheripbal's reaction to the uncontroversial observation is to first convince himself that it must be wrong and then project a specific and fantastical reason to explain why we
457.
by albedoa 6y ago
Though we see milder examples of this all the time, it's still wild to witness such an extreme case. The only way thaumasiotes's comments could be viewed as hostile is if you consider any correction to something you said to be hos
458.
by albedoa 6y ago
>> they can’t do 1/3+1/3=1/6 > Except that 1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3, not 1/6. That's why they can't do it.
459.
by albedoa 6y ago
We don't need you to respond. You have made it clear that there is nothing anyone can ever say or do to convince you that you are wrong.
460.
by albedoa 6y ago
We see the second half. Your sentence reduces to: > Trademark violations require intent to mislead, or they do not require intent to mislead. You are trying to assert that this makes sense and that the second half makes the first half co
461.
by albedoa 6y ago
Your correction is not fine. English is my first language, and I am telling you that the way you wrote the sentence makes it incorrect. It's probably your grammar more than your misunderstanding of the facts. Another commenter said the
462.
by albedoa 6y ago
As someone else mentioned, your correction is also incorrect. One can violate trademark unintentionally.
463.
by albedoa 6y ago
> the only site that I routinely visit that I have to have set on a higher-than-default zoom to be able to read is (ahem) Hacker News, because it uses tiny black fonts on light gray backgrounds. (Except for the places it uses, uh, tiny g
464.
by albedoa 6y ago
The top post is #828282 on top of #f6f6ef, a pretty low contrast of 3.541 compared to 21.000 for black on white.
465.
by albedoa 6y ago
You said: "Let's not make HN one of those sites." Either it is already one of those sites or there is room between the most extreme contrasts. Pick one.
466.
by albedoa 6y ago
> grey-on-color is lower contrast than white-on-color. > Let's not make HN one of those sites. The OP of the thread you are replying to is #828282 on top of #f6f6ef. That is lower contrast than black on white.
467.
by albedoa 6y ago
You transcend parody: http://wondermark.com/c/2014-09-19-1062sea.png I seriously doubt that you are unfamiliar with how people respond to sea lions, but you should get used to it. You are not entitled to my or anyone&#
468.
by albedoa 6y ago
You asked the question! If the reason you asked it is because you are genuinely interested in the answer, then you can reach out. No problem otherwise.
469.
by albedoa 6y ago
I'm happy to continue the conversation, but we shouldn't entertain the rantings of the guy who claims to believe that repeating the basis of his argument back to him is reductive. My Keybase is in the bio, either twitter or [my do
470.
by albedoa 6y ago
Nobody is reducing your comments. That is what you wrote.
471.
by albedoa 6y ago
We are talking about "radical views" here, not simply "viewpoints that don't align with our own". It's bizarre that you think those are the same.
472.
by albedoa 6y ago
> it's pretty fucked up that so many people just write off people because they hold radical political views. It's extremely reasonable actually.
473.
by albedoa 6y ago
You said that those things are theater until the day the product updates. We are beyond the day when that happened. So for it to be a fallacy you have to reject the context in which it was presented, which nobody but you is doing.
474.
by albedoa 6y ago
Calling it an interpretation is nothing short of revisionism. Nobody considers the hidden web server to have been an oversight. It required forethought and effort. It's not as if they didn't know what they were doing.
475.
by albedoa 6y ago
> What's wrong with something that "looks" incomplete If this is where you are starting from, then I'm not sure what kind of conversation you are hoping for. Requiring that we substantiate our definitions of good desi
476.
by albedoa 7y ago
> That being said, that's the game. If you can't get it done, someone else will get hired through linkedin, and you won't. But it's not the game here. Recruiters are being introduced to these candidates outside of Lin
477.
by albedoa 7y ago
Since this comment was written, narsil (Vinod Chandruis) has edited his profile to remove the fact that he is a co-founder of Kloudless. You can see it cached in google search results: https://www.google.com/search?q=narsil+
478.
by albedoa 7y ago
Candidates should know about Wayfair's response to their employee walkout last year. In an unsigned response by the leadership team, they said that it is important to respect "diversity of thought" regarding their relationshi
479.
by albedoa 7y ago
> That's a reasonable option for what "Catalina" might mean from context clues. Agreed! But my comment was in reply to someone who wants you to believe that he genuinely read "99.999%" as a claim about the size o
480.
by albedoa 7y ago
You thought "Catalina 10.15.4" referred to a human woman? Come on.

More ›