alainv

7 ms·

31.
by alainv 11y ago
Yes, this is very naive. They're actually asking for a forensic instrument - asserting that it is for a one-time use is absurd on the face of it. The most thorough deconstruction of this argument I've seen is here: http:/&#x
32.
by alainv 11y ago
Beautiful, thanks for sharing.
33.
by alainv 11y ago
It's rare to come across such an earnest belief in American exceptionalism these days. Do you have any sources for any of your positive assertions about the average American, or is it mainly personal experience/observed/anecd
34.
by alainv 11y ago
> And then we have fingerprints, which are very secure and onerous to imitate Aaaaand there goes the article's credibility. A pity, because there's a real need for a cogent debate about this panopticon-as-password program.
35.
by alainv 11y ago
You seem to say those are the only two options. There's clearly a third one: use the API and, if they suddenly enforce the excessively onerous terms, go public in an effort to make them back down from public pressure. This has been sho
36.
by alainv 11y ago
As opposed to a tiered acceptance based on the issuance/expiry date of said certificate. https://support.globalsign.com/customer/portal/articles/1447...
37.
by alainv 11y ago
Ok - can you elaborate why you so clearly favour aggression and blaming Ireland rather than simple domestic legislation and general political will to prevent these companies using other countries as tax havens?
38.
by alainv 11y ago
Poe's law? Poe's law.
39.
by alainv 11y ago
Am I missing something? Emby appears to have the exact same business plan with Emby Premiere.
40.
by alainv 11y ago
Looks very interesting! Do you plan to open-source SuperChief?
41.
by alainv 12y ago
Don't ask for much, do you? As it happens they quite agree: “I think that the best way to conserve the Dead Sea would be to reintroduce the natural flow from the Jordan River and decrease the pumping of water from the lake to the facto
42.
by alainv 12y ago
Fascinating that the core study the article focuses on is using strictly male subjects. I thought this had been a controversial approach[1] for quite some time now - yet they still claim the study's main goal is "doing it right.&q