akst

6 ms·

31.
by akst 7mo ago
The fact you’re talking someone with this frustration shows maybe there are people with use cases other than yours? When IDEs do resolve this it tends to be because they built some index to look up these identifiers, which is likely taking
32.
by akst 7mo ago
> If Amazon finds your product on another website for lower than its own website, it'll just hide your listing from the search -- this is meant to be pro-consumer (when you go to Amazon you'll get the lowest price). It’s not pr
33.
by akst 8mo ago
The whole obnoxious dogmatic evangelicalism thing is definitely a wider human phenomenon outside software and junior devs picking up new languages. Definitely isn’t one of those things that can be solved, but it’s helpful to be aware of and
34.
by akst 8mo ago
Have you got a link to this blog post?
35.
by akst 8mo ago
As someone who spent the last year messing around with web components, I think there’s some cool stuff there but I have a new level of appreciation for actual components APIs from actual frameworks. It’s more a custom element API than a com
36.
by akst 8mo ago
I would love the option for pay for usage for many products I am forced into paying a subscription for. I think one legitimate difficulty with micropayments for a news site (that has a few options to solve) is the reservation price of most
37.
by akst 8mo ago
I do sympathise as someone who has to scrape content from time to time, but that doesn't sound like a problem for the author of the content or something that impacts their intended user.
38.
by akst 8mo ago
Auto video playback in Twitter/X isn’t much better especially on the mobile app. I realised this can be remedied by switching to the webapp. It’s a subpar user experience due to constraints of mobile web (and lack of investment by X) b
39.
by akst 8mo ago
They’ve been rolling out a bunch of stuff like this in Australia and the UK. As an Australian I’m fairly certain I was made to do some sort of facial recognition some time ago. I kind of hate it, but honestly it’s had minimal impact on me a
40.
by akst 8mo ago
I think you might be making an entirely different point.
41.
by akst 8mo ago
In macroeconomic, you have an aggregate production functions that represents output for a country or something. In many of these function you'll have a parameter for technology, it acts as a multiplier over inputs, so the greater the m
42.
by akst 8mo ago
The argument here is founded on motivated reasoning. Copyright was founded on similar principles to property rights, it encourages desirable economic by ensuring investment in RnD doesn’t have a free-rider disincentive. Whether it’s the rig
43.
by akst 8mo ago
I take it because copyright was used to hurt independent and smaller harmless creators, they’re dislike of AI is entirely consistent with that given smaller creatives are being harmed in a sense with their work mimicked and work deprived of
44.
by akst 8mo ago
That’s also another thing. Sometimes the output is just junk, like there wasn’t really any intention behind the test to prevent a certain likely scenario arising Sometimes it just add tests that lock in specific quirks of the code that were
45.
by akst 8mo ago
Yeah, there’s something convenient about a dedicated device when you’re using a notebook and pen and your only other screen is your phone. It’s also nice not having to dedicate screen space to a calculator too. If I have something more comp
46.
by akst 8mo ago
ATM I feel like LLM writing tests can be a bit dangerous at times, there are cases where it's fine there are cases where it's not. I don't really think I could articulate a systemised basis for identifying either case, but I
47.
by akst 8mo ago
You know you CAN actually quantify how bad or good these things are in what respect and their second order effects. The trades off are pretty well understood. Increasing returns to scale are a thing, as are natural monopolies where consolid
48.
by akst 8mo ago
If you’re assessing things entirely on a strategic basis makes total sense. It’s understandable why they are doing it but I wouldn’t go so far as to say it’s underrated or suggest there are no drawbacks. Duplicating things without reason i
49.
by akst 8mo ago
I think their point was the meaning of multi-words isn't the result of structure or word order, such as many idioms for example aren't interpreted literally or their grammar isn't too important. But this is also academia they
50.
by akst 9mo ago
The paper is basically saying “we have evidence that supports language comprehension inconsistent independently of structural hierarchy” [1] (or at least that’s my read of it). However I imagine linguists have a more precise definition than
51.
by akst 9mo ago
Feel free to reread the article title. Let’s not pretend like your original point here was they were barely using features of web components correctly, like the parent of this thread was clearly implying.
52.
by akst 9mo ago
Unless you’re referring to academic paper, I’m not getting a pay wall. I read the article (but not the paper), but it doesn’t sound like a no. But I also don’t find the claim that surprising given in other languages word matters a lot less.
53.
by akst 9mo ago
yeah the messaging is somewhat insecure in that it preemptively seeks to invalidate criticism by just being an experiment while simultaneously making fairly inflammatory remarks about nay sayers like they'll eat dirt if they don't
54.
by akst 9mo ago
I think I’d be interested in seeing something written about architectural decisions and how the architecture and your experience writing it differed from other non GPU projects (charting ideally but non-charting is fine too), and any unique
55.
by akst 9mo ago
In case you’ve forgotten this is a thread on an article about web components. If the underlying premise of your point was entirely independent of web components you’ve done pretty poor job of communicating it. So you actually do that? Use c
56.
by akst 9mo ago
> It's symbolism Ah no... this is people's money, and they likely came to conclusion the US bonds are inconsistent with the funds goals and risk appetite. Within the first few paragraphs of the article you see this: > The de
57.
by akst 9mo ago
Web components come with additional complexity, heavy use of custom element definitions are more complicated to manage. It’s more than just an aesthetic preference But if you’re not really using web components it’s harmless but it’s a bit o
58.
by akst 9mo ago
I disagree on the number of elements actually approaching problematic territory, but agree this just isn’t something you can’t do already without web components
59.
by akst 9mo ago
I think if anything if Wikipedia contributes to encouraging someone take an interest in these things like this, despite not in school, that’s definitely a positive. But if these are moderators on Wikipedia that sounds pretty bad, but even t
60.
by akst 9mo ago
Cheers, yeah I did, I think missed that while tired

More ›