Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
akerl_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
563 ms
·
3271.
▲
VPS Disk Performance, Digital Ocean vs. Linode
(irj972.co.uk)
89 points
by
akerl_
13y ago
|
36 comments
3272.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Is there a reason for not adding such files to your .gitignore? I'm a neat-freak when it comes to file placement, and have a ~/tmp directory specifically for dropping one-off files without cluttering up repos and such. Are the thi
3273.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
</troll>
3274.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
I'm sure that there's going to be plenty of dissent on this, but Arch is a pretty simple distro and attempts to keep packages as vanilla as possible. Their wiki is also an awesome resource (I find myself using it even when trouble
3275.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Are we really going to fault Canonical for developing new open source projects, or for those projects not being adopted outside of Ubuntu? I don't have a need for another file manager any more than I needed another init system, but if
3276.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
No offense, but there really aren't "shades of gray" here. I've definitely pirated things, but not wanting to pay the cost of something doesn't entitle you to spring forth "illegally downloading" as a just
3277.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Can you clarify how pirating Adobe's software is "the only option available to [you]"? I get that it's ridiculously expensive and generally a pain in the ass... but needing to do something expensive doesn't provide
3278.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
I don't suppose there's some way to disable x32 from within a running system that's not using it? edit: It doesn't appear there is. Not shocking, but I was hoping for a bit of luck.
3279.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
I am not actively using it, but I am running kernels that have CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled.
3280.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Awesome! Any chance the keychain patches can be applied against this?
3281.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Has anyone seen talk of this leading to an expedited 3.13.2/3.12.10 release? If I need to manually patch my kernels to fix this, I'll do it, but if upstream is going to release fixed versions shortly, that seems like the preferabl
3282.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
I don't run Ubuntu myself, but CONFIG_X86_X32 isn't a new architecture, it's an option for 64 bit kernels. Based on the state of that bug report, it looks like it's an option they've enabled in their recent 64 bit k
3283.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Unfortunately, it looks like Ubuntu just recently enabled it in their kernels: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1274754
3284.
▲
Linux 3.4+: arbitrary write with CONFIG_X86_X32 (CVE-2014-0038)
(seclists.org)
94 points
by
akerl_
13y ago
|
70 comments
3285.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
I doubt that their security emails do that, but even if they do, changing how you get the key wouldn't fix a PGP compatibility issue, since once you have the key you'd still be emailing them using it.
3286.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Can you clarify what kind of CNAME you're referring to? The only CNAMEs that aren't "supported" are CNAMEs on the root of a zone, which are a violation of the DNS spec, as CNAMEs cannot coexist with other records, which
3287.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Ah, my bad. I didn't notice the curl shown, since it's listed next to language implementations
3288.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
After browsing the site, I'm left with 2 questions: What does this service offer that makes it more desirable than the whole crowd of other Notification-As-A-Service providers, and how do I make an API call to it? It doesn't look
3289.
▲
TravisCI requires admin permission for all repos
(github.com)
1 points
by
akerl_
13y ago
|
0 comments
3290.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
The only credentials that were accessible were hashed forum passwords from the time of the restore (all of which have been revoked), and forum accounts are not linked to any other Linode systems.
3291.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
I use a similar method, which I based on a previous HN post: https://github.com/akerl/dotfiles/blob/master/.bundles/marks I'm addicted to one/two-letter aliases, and between that and ZSH c
3292.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
That 404s for me. I did some googling, and am not able to find any tests outside of the ones linked from the contributions guide EDIT: It looks like the integration tests reside here: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker&
3293.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Docker requires some kernel options both for networking (VLANs/etc) and devicemapper (thin provisioning, in particular) that the Linode kernel didn't have enabled before. You could run Docker on a Linode by using your own kernel w
3294.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
Can you clarify which integration tests you're referring to? I'd be happy to run them and provide the output. I ran through the whole process linked from the Github repo ( http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/c
3295.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
That's what I figured, and I'm glad to have it confirmed. I've seen enough projects that have a rigid "if your dev environment isn't perfect, your code's no good to us" mindset that I was wary. Also, just
3296.
▲
by
akerl_
13y ago
The Linode kernel appears to only fail the AUFS portion, as expected: https://gist.github.com/akerl/8245192 I'm not sure how the Docker devs handle non-AUFS-related contributions from contributors whose systems do