ajross

53 ms·

961.
by ajross 1y ago
I don't have numbers for you, but the answer is likely of the order "almost always after a rollover". The cage will protect the occupants from being crushed, not the high-tolerance door and hinge clearances. And rollovers a
962.
by ajross 1y ago
I note you didn't answer my question, though. And also that you replied to just one word ("scam") and not the substance of the point.
963.
by ajross 1y ago
See... that's the scam. You have in your mind a "They" that doesn't actually correspond to real people. Seriously: name the three "most wanted" antifa offenders you want to see jailed under this order. Can y
964.
by ajross 1y ago
Right, but the software side of the stack needs a way for subsystems to say "I'm important, don't suspend", and that's what this systemd feature is for. The fact that it's based on top of an S3 suspend to RAM
965.
by ajross 1y ago
But again, AML disassembly may show that it was bad code, but it's at-least-mostly-working code, and provided in a form that can be disassembled and inspected. Lots and lots of robust Linux drivers have been written based on analysi
966.
by ajross 1y ago
"Digits" are constant in an FFT (or rather ignored, really, precision is out of scope of the algorithm definition). Obviously in practice these are implemented as (pairs of, for a complex FFT, though real-valued DCTs are much more
967.
by ajross 1y ago
> At the root of the fast transform is the simple fact that Actually... no? That's a constant factor optimization; the second expression has 75% the operations of the first. The FFT is algorithmically faster. It's O(N·log2
968.
by ajross 1y ago
You're arguing with someone else, not me. I'm your ally in this fight, remember. But again, you're simply wrong as a matter of practice. Deportation does not require a criminal trial, and never has. The conflation with c
969.
by ajross 1y ago
The factorization trick was reinvented several times. The algorithm that uses it to do a frequency decomposition was presented just once by named authors. This happens all the time. Freaking out about naming and attribution isn't r
970.
by ajross 1y ago
That's fine. In fact you're right that laptop and desktop power management is generally best done manually by expert users. That how I have things set up too, more often than not. The use case for wakelocks (a longtime Android fe
971.
by ajross 1y ago
That's deliberately misinterpreting. The overwhelming criticism of this view count regression kerfuffle was centered around creators and the lost revenue: YouTube was pervasively accused of cooking numbers to stiff their creators. N
972.
by ajross 1y ago
And the inability to reason from evidence is a big part of the disconnect here. That article doesn't substantiate your statement. The single quote in the charging document it's talking about is that he had become "more pro-g
973.
by ajross 1y ago
> If someone like AOC or Bernie Sanders was viciously attacked at an event, you can't tell me that you would accept an unsourced assertion that "it was actually a marxist that harmed them." So, first, both of those two (AO
974.
by ajross 1y ago
> It’s a view counter. People want to know how much it was watched That's emphatically not what people "people want". People want to get paid. And creators get paid based on views. So... per the upthread point, paying
975.
by ajross 1y ago
FWIW, that's not strictly true. We deport non-criminal foreigners for diplomatic reasons all the time. I think it's very reasonable to imagine an enforcement regime (not the one we have) where legitimate workers (and their famil
976.
by ajross 1y ago
The pedantic correction is important in this case: "cancellation" is a private action between citizens, this is "censorship", which is done at the behest of the government. The former can be arguably but reasonably unde
977.
by ajross 1y ago
> Who actually benefits from such limits? People who work. It's just an economic argument. The US (and any other targets of net immigration, really) has a higher wage level than the regions from which the labor is arriving, more o
978.
by ajross 1y ago
For clarity: yes, criminal law would take precedence for domestic crimes. I'm saying that if one presupposes a justly and reasonably administered Immigrant Work Visa program, that it's reasonable to arrest and deport people who s
979.
by ajross 1y ago
I think you do understand. But for the record, here's the boring centrist bougie liberal take on immigration policy: 1. If we have jobs available, people should be able to immigrate to do them. 2. Changes in enforcement policy should
980.
by ajross 1y ago
This is a contract, not a click through license. You can't do that. (Legally you can't do it with a click-through either, but the lack of a contract means that the recourse for the user is just to stop buying the service.)
981.
by ajross 1y ago
It's not like you can apply a software security patch to a 1970's hardware communication device in orbit. They're likely going to continue acting as open repeaters until their orbit decays and they fall.
982.
by ajross 1y ago
I think that's right. Though my understanding is that the Windows code is derived from the original Intel one too and has evolved in tandem with the Intel-maintained driver. And... yeah, acpica (drivers/acpica/acpica) is ju
983.
by ajross 1y ago
But... that's an email that would be sent to a non -gmail address, the one on file that you originally registered your account with. And while I don't have copies of the transactions in front of me, these things are not unclea
984.
by ajross 1y ago
Yeah. ACPI's AML bytecode is sort of a mixed blessing. It allows for reverse engineering and end user analasys/fixing of bugs like this. It's also just a terrible disaster of a programming environment, with a very large (te
985.
by ajross 1y ago
> — never give out codes sent to use via sms or push notifications to someone requesting them via phone or email. Never. The messages often even say that! I tried making this point downthread but it bears repeating higher up. Per OP, t
986.
by ajross 1y ago
> Good chance my reading comprehension is shot and I'm missing something, I suppose That's more charitable than me. My UnreliableNarrator sense is tingling really badly here.
987.
by ajross 1y ago
Something isn't adding up here. The author is excruciatingly rigorous with documenting lots of stuff here, including the screenshots. Then glosses over this bit awfully fast: > So when he asked me to read back a code — supposedly
988.
by ajross 1y ago
You miss the point. You can't mug someone for their Vanguard account. Robbery risk is limited to cash on hand, or arguably whatever the ATM limit is on your bank account.
989.
by ajross 1y ago
> I strongly feel that infrastructure code (an OS) should be more open source, I dont see Microsoft or Apple open sourcing any time soon If only there were another platform vendor with different thoughts about open source infrastructure
990.
by ajross 1y ago
> How dare OP adapt their family recipes so they can be usable. What an affront to nature. It's an affront to tradition . And that's important to a lot of people. It happens not to be important to a lot of very inward-look

More ›