ajnin

63 ms·

1. 691.▲
   by ajnin 11y ago

   Similar experiment I did a while back : http://www.bidouille.org/misc/moviemaps
2. 692.▲
   by ajnin 11y ago

   > shitty servers as default are better than none No, absolutely not. Defaults that can cause subtle errors are worse than a program abort with an error message telling you to fill in a configuration value. Especially after reminding that
3. 693.▲
   by ajnin 11y ago

   Yes judgments are being made in the name of the French people, and thus are public (although this does not mean they are publicized on a website, you may have to go to the court to consult them). Decisions regarding the work code can be app
4. 694.▲
   by ajnin 12y ago

   True, but at least it shows you the actual result of applying the diff to the HEAD, as opposed to all other GUI tools that show you a diff that nobody has seen, let alone tested, in a merged state. So what is done by bitbucket is better in
5. 695.▲
   by ajnin 12y ago

   Great. So with this proposal all website operators that don't pay their due to the Certificate Authority cartel will be marked as "bad" sites. I'm all for restoring trust but not before the CA issue is resolved.
6. 696.▲
   by ajnin 12y ago

   However every project's balance is stored in your coffers, correct ? And you use an exponential decay function to distribute tips (1% of the balance per commit), which means that some fraction of the donated amount will always remain i