Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ajkjk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ajkjk
18d ago
Everybody knows it's not a sure thing, it's a question of trustworthiness. OpenAI is not trustworthy at all; this random researcher is and seems honest so far. iThe fact that people are corroborating Bubeck being a piece of shit i
32.
▲
by
ajkjk
18d ago
They keep saying 'we' and 'our' but I'm pretty sure this is an 'I' and 'my' thing.
33.
▲
by
ajkjk
18d ago
I dunno, I like math and I still think automatically solving problems is worth doing. If problem-solving is a hobby then it will still be a hobby after all this. If it's about doing things for humanity--which it often is since many tho
34.
▲
by
ajkjk
19d ago
it seems like a person could cheat by finding an open problem that's AI-solvable ahead of time (by trying many problems), and then pretend to do it for the first time in the competition. You can't verify past chat logs so make sur
35.
▲
by
ajkjk
19d ago
sorry I edited my comment because I wasn't quite sure what I meant by that either. I am too sleepy. But, I disagree. partial functions B->A are just a superset of functions B->A, so requiring g to be partial is just relaxing a re
36.
▲
by
ajkjk
19d ago
I think a slightly better fix is to change definitions to allow g = { (1, {}) } to be regarded as a left-inverse to g, that is, to allow left-inverses to be partial functions, rather than full functions. The definition still requires they
37.
▲
by
ajkjk
19d ago
that's not really how eigenvalues work... they specifically also model the case where the result keeps changing exponentially.
38.
▲
by
ajkjk
20d ago
well I didn't say anything about needing complex structure or sounding impressive. But I don't like it. It trivializes the expression of emotion in a way I don't like and I don't think people should emulate. It feels lik
39.
▲
by
ajkjk
20d ago
this reads like a worksheet for eight year olds teaching them how to put their feelings into words
40.
▲
by
ajkjk
20d ago
it's a real shame that this sort of environment isn't found everywhere for free. I'm pretty sure the people who would thrive in it are out there and it's just a coordination problem. a lot of people love their jobs becau
41.
▲
by
ajkjk
21d ago
"Aiding and Abetting" crime is also a crime. Free speech has nothing to do with it.
42.
▲
by
ajkjk
21d ago
we really do not want to engineer a system in which using bugs to make money is considered economically legitimate activity. It is still crime. The main reason to report bugs and get the bounties for doing so is still because it makes the w
43.
▲
by
ajkjk
23d ago
the fact that they are sometimes communicated by email doesn't mean that the best way to communicate them is by email. Personal correspondence references are specifically terrible as references since you can't go read them...
44.
▲
by
ajkjk
24d ago
Dunno who you're arguing with, I didn't say they didn't produce anything of value. I said they aren't producing scientific papers. Conversations are not like papers. The scientists have conversations (sometimes on mailin
45.
▲
by
ajkjk
24d ago
The linux developers' mailing lists are not producing anything like scientific papers...
46.
▲
by
ajkjk
24d ago
You think that people's findings should be communicated by email? that their email chains are what should go into the permanent record and be cited and printed out and included in journals and such? would you include all the quoted tex
47.
▲
by
ajkjk
27d ago
you're completely wrong, (intelligent) Americans are completely aware of the concept and more-or-less think in those terms regularly. You won't find the term in speeches but that's because in America speeches are essentially
48.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
I normally have no autobiographical memory, but once I went to a weeklong meditation retreat and around the second day it sorta all showed up at once. Anecdotal but perhaps interesting.
49.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
I'm sure it's not, because most of the time I'm aphantasic and rarely I'm not and they're completely different phenomenological experiences.
50.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
since we're making things up -- why don't we just spin up a program that trains a bunch of novice clerics to cast Cure Disease?
51.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
I can't see anything?
52.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
I imagine that Dr Bronner's unhingedness is a net asset for the brand. I always prefer to buy things that seem less sterilized by corporateness.
53.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
It is real but it's about the unaccountability, dishonesty, and misanthropy of corporate overlords, rather than about the externalities of data centers per se. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49180901 It was a
54.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
The idea is that it lowers the number of thieves.
55.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
Ah, I was only referring to the things in the OP. I don't know anything about Cloudflare in particular.
56.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
I am just assessing the work that I saw. I saw people do stupid things constantly when people could have clearly done better work. It wasn't market pressure, it was just an organization with lax standards and weak leadership. Obviously
57.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
I didn't say that AI products aren't related to the market. The problem is not that they're AI it's that they're badly done.
58.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
Because it affects people personally? They are using the stuff that's being neglected, and they could be using the stuff that is being half-assed if it's better. And I don't believe it has to do with the market. I've wor
59.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
I think that there is a sort of mechanism by which, when a human speaks to you, you can "mirror" their internal mental state, and the quality of writing often corresponds to how much you get pleasure or information or whatever you
60.
▲
by
ajkjk
1mo ago
yep, agreed. The problem is not "bone cancer charities must have a way of getting their message out!" therefore "they should be able to bug you about it while you're reading an article". The problem is that the thin
More ›