Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ajcp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
121.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
You're conflating the use of vectors to only mean how they relate to semantic meaning. As vectors are just spatial relationships, in the case of objects in Factorio we could provide the vectors for every single object as to how they re
122.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Did you try providing 2D vectors of where each object relates to every other object? Seems like the most obvious way. In my experience the current generation of models are very poor at spatial reasoning even when given accurate coordinate b
123.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Can't recommend 'Collapse: The Fall of the Soviet Union' by Vladislav M Zubok enough. An absolute page-turner that makes this super clear.
124.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Very nice. I have a lot of experience in this space (RPA/DPA/* Process Automation)! Tne thing people fail to see -and makers sell on- is that the value proposition of these platforms is NOT the "low code, no code" capabi
125.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
> opening doors to innovations in AI-driven reasoning, healthcare, and beyond. You went with "healthcare"?
126.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
I was just commenting on something toward this end, but think I took it further than just UI to apply to the whole software: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42562289
127.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
One thing I look for during an interview is does the candidate use Google as part of their answer workflow. While having a candidate who just "knows" the answer might be great, eventually they wont, and what then? I'd rather
128.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
-> Not everyone believes democracy means what you think it means. What are different democracies people believe in?
129.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
-> consolidate power in the executive -> which is badly needed In the US power is divided between three branches of government to prevent any one bench from becoming too powerful through checks and balances. Consolidation of power in
130.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Yup, unfortunately the only way to know how good an AI is at anything is to do the same way you'd do with a human: build a test that you know the answers to already. That's also why the accuracy evaluation was by far the most time
131.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
> why do it now and introduce complexity and debt if you can do it later when you actually need it? The same reason I don't wait until it snows to buy snowboots. I know my environment, topography, scale, risk-profile, and costs, and
132.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
In this use-case the customer just wanted data not currently in the warehouse inventory management system capatured, so here we converted a JSON response to a classic table row schema (where 1 row = 1 document) and now boom, shipping data!
133.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Not sure what service you're basing your calculation on but with Gemmini I've processed 10,000,000+ shipping documents (PDF and PNGs) of every concievable layout in one month at under $1000 and an accuracy rate of between 80-82% (
134.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
GCP's Document AI service is now literally just a UI layer specific to document parsing use-cases back by Gemini models. When we realized that we dumped it and just use Gemini directly.
135.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
> but that's not generalizable. You only referenced two companies...
136.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
It's odd that of the two replies referencing people, both got their names obviously wrong. Is that a new phishing tactic?
137.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Was acceptance of a pardon an "assumption" by the court? Is it not "admission* of guilt", which I believe itself was never the case as this was based on a judge's aside that people didn't accept pardons because
138.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Now it's mainly BYU...
139.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Haha, I've actually had the exact opposite problem: I was looking for a specific answer I knew I had only to find an obviously wrong answer on Stack, think to myself "who is this moron with his bag of lies", only to find it w
140.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Ah, yes, preference! How well will the AI know what we prefer without us having to articulate it every time. Very good, I like this. Let's turn that on it's head: maybe we engage with AI/AI products that seem to just provide
141.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Funny enough it was you I was attempting to paraphrase :)
142.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Maybe not "evolve" but certainly would be different every time, right? If it already knows every conivable way to generate something, it stands to reason it will be different every time, as every request will be a little different
143.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
One thing I notice when reading CTO/CIOs' thoughts on their role, regardless of their experience level or how they attained the position, is that those who mention being "hands-on" – that is, coding or "being techni
144.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Interconnected by Kevin Xu https://interconnected.blog/
145.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
It's Google Cloud Platforms "AI" service[0], so actually more analogous to what is now called Azure AI Foundry[1], and what used to be called Azure OpenAI Studio. Microsoft Copilot Studio[2] (formally Power Platform Power Vir
146.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
Not just totally aligned, but also "just-in-time" and ephemeral: an LLM goes and does/builds it on request, and then destroys all artifacts when the request has been fulfilled? If the persistence of something incurs a cost in
147.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
It feels like problem with these aren't the ideas, rather the "let's just" approach/expectation in front of them. For instance "Let's just add an API." I think the approach to an API as "just&quo
148.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
> For the current version, we are using a Mistral LLM (Mistral 7B) hosted within Mozilla’s GCP instance. Based on this I would assume they are using GCP Vertex AI as that's going to be WAY cheaper than rolling it all themselves and
149.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
The Onions announcement of his death: 48-Year-Old Rabbit Finally Finishes the Job[0] 0. https://theonion.com/48-year-old-rabbit-finally-finishes-the...
150.
▲
by
ajcp
2y ago
It's funny you say that because whenever I see a standup special and the comedian seems to randomly be prompted by something they see in the audience/off camera that leads them down a bespoke, yet perfect response/thread I ha
More ›