ajayvk

5 ms·

31.
by ajayvk 7mo ago
Another recent article on this topic https://www.arthurcnops.blog/death-of-show-hn/
32.
Show HN: OpenRun – Declarative Deployments to Docker or Kubernetes(github.com)
21 points by ajayvk 8mo ago|0 comments
33.
by ajayvk 8mo ago
Authentication and authorization are important requirements for internal tools. Low-code platforms support authn/authz for app access. Building internal tools with code is much easier now with GenAI, but ensuring proper RBAC access con
34.
by ajayvk 11mo ago
Building https://github.com/openrundev/openrun , a platform for declarative deployment of web apps. OpenRun runs as a web server, which does GitOps driven app deployments. You can currently deploy apps on a standalone m
35.
by ajayvk 11mo ago
https://devpu.sh/ is another alternative, it has a nice UI built with Hypermedia (HTMX). I am building https://github.com/openrundev/openrun/ . Main difference is that OpenRun has a declarative int
36.
by ajayvk 11mo ago
This post looks at the experience with using Starlark as against YAML for deployment configuration. Starlark can result in much more concise and flexible config. It does require extra work on the part of the developers who are writing the c
37.
Python as a Configuration Language Using Starlark(openrun.dev)
2 points by ajayvk 11mo ago|1 comments
38.
by ajayvk 1y ago
There has been lots of discussions about the issues with YAML and other config languages. This post looks at the experience with using Starlark as the configuration language for infrastructure deployment using OpenRun. Starlark can result i
39.
Python as a Configuration Language Using Starlark(openrun.dev)
4 points by ajayvk 1y ago|1 comments
40.
by ajayvk 1y ago
Yes, had similar questions. Wouldn't tuning the settings for the buffer table have helped avoid the TOO_MANY_LINKS error?
41.
by ajayvk 1y ago
If you are fine with running lots of apps on one beefy machine, the project I am building https://github.com/openrundev/openrun provides a similar abstraction as App Runner and Cloud Run (automatically deploy web apps
42.
by ajayvk 1y ago
I have been building OpenRun, a declarative web app deployment platform https://github.com/openrundev/openrun . It is an open source alternative to Google Cloud Run and AWS App Runner, running on your own hardware. Open
43.
by ajayvk 1y ago
Any repo which has a Dockerfile can be deployed directly. For frameworks like Streamlit/Gradio/FastHTML/Shiny/Reflex/Flask/FastAPI, OpenRun supports zero-config deployments, there is no need to even have a Dock
44.
Show HN: OpenRun - Deploy web apps declaratively(github.com)
3 points by ajayvk 1y ago|2 comments
45.
by ajayvk 1y ago
I have been building an app deployment service https://github.com/openrundev/openrun . For the use case of network routing for services running in containers, OpenRun provides a simpler abstraction. It does the containe
46.
by ajayvk 1y ago
Clace is built to run on a single machine without needing Kubernetes. The plan is to add support for Kubernetes hosting later, but running on one or a few machines should not required Kubernetes. Clace is built for the use case of deploying
47.
by ajayvk 1y ago
A recent improvement in import map support in the browser https://shopify.engineering/resilient-import-maps
48.
by ajayvk 1y ago
https://github.com/claceio/clace is project I am building which gives a Cloud Run type deployment experience on your own VMs. For each app, it supports scale down to zero containers (scaling up beyond one is being buil
49.
Clace AppServer – GitOps in a single command(github.com)
1 points by ajayvk 1y ago|1 comments
50.
by ajayvk 1y ago
I have been building https://github.com/claceio/clace , an application server for deploying containerized apps. Docs are at https://clace.io/ . There are many deployment tools focussed on simplifying con
51.
by ajayvk 1y ago
I have been building https://github.com/claceio/clace , an appserver for deploying containerized apps. Docs are at https://clace.io/ . There are many deployment tools focussed on simplifying containerize
52.
Show HN: First AppServer built for deploying containerized apps(clace.io)
1 points by ajayvk 1y ago|1 comments
53.
by ajayvk 1y ago
Starlark does allow for much more concise and powerful config specification. I am building https://github.com/claceio/clace , which is an application server for teams to deploy internal tools. Clace uses Starlark for de
54.
by ajayvk 1y ago
Having a single process web/app server simplifies things operationally. I am building https://github.com/claceio/clace , which is an application server for teams to deploy internal tools. It runs as a single proces
55.
by ajayvk 2y ago
Thanks. Clace is built for teams to be be able to deploy internal tools (Streamlit/Gradio etc). That use case requires some extra features (OAuth/Auditing/Declarative config etc). Kubernetes with ArgoCD plus IDP seems to have
56.
by ajayvk 2y ago
Another option you could consider is a tool I have been building for deploying webapps across a team. https://github.com/claceio/clace has the usual deployment related functionality like gitops, TLS certs. It has some
57.
by ajayvk 2y ago
I have been building a platform [1] which makes it easy to deploy internal tools. Instead of taking the config file approach, it allows you to install each app at a unique location (domain name + url path). Within its location, the app owns
58.
Rethinking Web Server Config - Isolation across Apps(clace.io)
1 points by ajayvk 2y ago|0 comments
59.
by ajayvk 2y ago
Yes, it would be great if this approach becomes more common for web servers. Since Clace is built for internal tools, even new app installation can be done by regular users. If the namespace is available, a new app can use that without conf
60.
by ajayvk 2y ago
Web server config which is a blob of text is a pet peeve of mine. This makes every config update risky and simultaneous updates by multiple users is difficult to coordinate. This presents an alternate approach for handling web server config

More ›