aj

37 ms·

481.
by aj 17y ago
I actually thought of the same. The trouble is that most enterprise application vendors will not be so willing to change their application. And this in turn will reduce the rate of adoption of the new browser in an environment already very
482.
by aj 17y ago
Unfortunately, there is no simple way out of this. ALL the applications across the Internets will have to be changed.. Legacy code comes back to bite us in the rear again!
483.
Opera 10 Browser UA string format changed to accomodate bad applications(dev.opera.com)
32 points by aj 17y ago|21 comments
484.
by aj 17y ago
Ah.. I knew I was missing something :) Thanks for explaining that
485.
UI Changes in Windows 7 RC (b/w build 7000 and 7100)(arstechnica.com)
1 points by aj 17y ago|0 comments
486.
by aj 17y ago
I've been facing a weird issue as well. If I submit a URL, it gets submitted normally. But if I submit a question or a topic to initiate discussion, it does not get submitted. The page goes to http://news.ycombinator.com/r which is just a
487.
by aj 17y ago
Um, I noticed that you the item number you used was 625256 but the URL has 625255 ( http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=625255 ) But then I have no idea what language or query that is so I probably misunderstood
488.
by aj 17y ago
Yes but those are boring and lack imagination (no offence meant to you but speaking from a global brand perspective) Ovi is different yet not overly complicated or difficult to pronounce or remember.
489.
by aj 17y ago
You are kidding right? You do not need an app to access the store. You can access it via your browser as well. And there is a downloadable app.
490.
by aj 17y ago
Ah I missed that.. Especially with that heading
491.
Nokia's Ovi app store goes live(conversations.nokia.com)
14 points by aj 17y ago|19 comments
492.
World's "Fastest" Small Web Server Released, Based On Lisp(tech.slashdot.org)
1 points by aj 17y ago|3 comments
493.
by aj 17y ago
Oh I agree. There SHOULD be privacy controls. I was only disagreeing with the OP that all contact information should be "not required" at all. My take is: Yes, collect the contact information (and as much as feasible, ensure it is valid) bu
494.
by aj 17y ago
I agree with you. There are numerous cases when a domain is abused and nothing can be done. Consider the case that the domain owner has leased out the domain to a 3rd party who are willfully abusing the domain? Without the contact info, it
495.
by aj 17y ago
I don't think it is owned by PG or YC. At least the from domain info, it is not very obvious. I would be careful and not login to that domain with my HN credentials
496.
by aj 17y ago
What's the bet that if this poll is for the ban, there will be a negative post about HN? :))
497.
by aj 17y ago
Agreed. But how much does that benefit outweigh the obvious negative? And is the amount of bile being spewed by the TechCrunch writers good for the startup community?
498.
by aj 17y ago
Adblock plus would do as well for FF users :)
499.
by aj 17y ago
wow.. you'd think a simple math problem would not generate such a wrong answer on Google! Perhaps they use the Inter processors with the math bug, only this time it affects integral calculations ;)
500.
Map of World Arms Imports 2007-2008(solyaris.net)
1 points by aj 17y ago|0 comments
501.
by aj 17y ago
Pretty old article. It's from Feb
502.
by aj 18y ago
Ah.. Oh.. Well, logically, I came to that conclusion as well (as indicated by my comment) You comment indicating otherwise needs more investigation. I wish there was some statistical data to help determine this more conclusively :)
503.
by aj 18y ago
<i>(b) new threads that are neither clearly spammy (banned) nor clearly unspammy (allowed on as now) should be provisionally allowed on the new page, but then banned should a single reader flag it, without the intervention of a mode
504.
by aj 18y ago
Ah.. Thanks for the link. I missed that during my vacation..
505.
by aj 18y ago
I think that is the most fuzzy part. Determining combined productivity, factoring the "improved" quality and the knowledge sharing and gain is a lot more difficult than simply adding up the individual productivity of each programmer (whatev
506.
by aj 18y ago
But what about when it is interesting but only say more technically challenging than grunt work?
507.
by aj 18y ago
> we'll have less technical debt due to pairing. Could you explain this point? I think most of the points you make a pretty good points. I have not worked in a pair programming environment myself but find it quite attractive. Mainly bec
508.
Freeware Design Comp alternatives
1 points by aj 18y ago|0 comments
509.
Ask HN: How useful is Pair Programming?
23 points by aj 18y ago|25 comments
510.
by aj 18y ago
WTF! Why would you post such a stupid link?

More ›