Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aj3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
151.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
There are plenty of SAAS that use GPL'd code on the backend. That's fine.
152.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
You're giving AI too much credit, it's just a tool, it does not have it's own intentions. I.e. if you buy a piano or a guitar, you could play and record copyrighted music on it. That's not piano's or guitar's f
153.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Moreover, some prefer both. I know because I am one of them. Really enjoyed the opportunity to wfh before the pandemic and am really excited about the office now. I guess I just like the change of the scenery.
154.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Say humans went extinct and some alien species revived us from collected germ cells. Even if they could work out all the genetic quirks to make new population sustainable, 40000 years of social progress would be lost. Resurrected population
155.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
LTSB is already not supported by various games, Adobe products and even MS Office.
156.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Mozilla doesn't have an incentive to add RSS since they would prefer larger Pocket adoption.
157.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
The whole saga with the outside oversight is also a complete red herring. USA would never sign a treaty that required them to show their own facilities. Case in point: biological weapons convention. A few years back there was a very popula
158.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Ubiquity introduced new vulns while fixing that fiasco from last year: https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2021/5/24/cve-2021-22... On the other hand, all of the other networking HW sucks just as much
159.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Yes they do get compromised and the information is published regularly. E.g. here is a news item from just this week: https://www.reuters.com/technology/denmarks-central-bank-exp...
160.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Solarwinds was distributed by a malicious patch (through legit channels). So all orgs were unpatched and in fact all got at least first stage downloaded (if they patched during that window).
161.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
SolarWinds affected 100% of installations that updated their deployments during that 8 month window. Your 1% comes from the ratio of networks that were specifically targeted and received 2nd stage with all the goodies. The reason why 2nd st
162.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
I disagree with this attitude. Many demos such as this one with Quake code are intentionally looking for (funny) outliers by bending the rules. But this is not how anyone would use the system in a real scenario (no one should select license
163.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
I don't work for Github (nor MS) and do not represent Copilot.
164.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
In a real world scenario you wouldn't be mindlessly pressing Tab right after linebreak and accepting the first suggestion that comes your way. While entertaining, nobody gets paid to do that. What you get paid is to write your own code
165.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Code completion that can suggest the whole line instead of a single word (e.g. often it guesses function parameters and various math operations when you haven't even typed function name yet).
166.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
If you use it as a programming partner it will simply autofill whatever you're writing line-by-line. You're not forced to use code completion at a whole-function level and it's not even the suggested use-case.
167.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Depends. If you find useful code on Github, Stack Overflow or anywhere else in the internet, you still need to check whether it is suitable with your licensing or not.
168.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Then write the code yourself. It's not like you're forced to use this demo.
169.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Does GitHub Copilot write perfect code? No. GitHub Copilot tries to understand your intent and to generate the best code it can, but the code it suggests may not always work, or even make sense. While we are working hard to make GitHub Copi
170.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Copilot is a tool. If you take copilot's suggestions uncritically and push them to Github, - that's on you.
171.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Isn't peer review usually blind?
172.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
I think they mean "death prevented" vs "death inflicted".
173.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
I disagree. The main problem is the way they calculate NNTV as if the risk of infection was linear. It's not since there is a positive loop. In the absence of a vaccine, rate of infection grows which in turn increases the risk of infec
174.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Come on, there is a huge gap between 1) writing a single function (potentially incorrectly) with a known prototype/interface and a description and 2) designing interfaces, datatypes and APIs themselves.
175.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
This sounds like an amazing hiring process. Hopefully it becomes more common.
176.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Of course not. There are even certain minorities which are known to extremely exagerrate their abilities and accomplishments (even when they wouldn't last a day on actual job). I really think it's as simple as having friends/
177.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Another cool idea is to list what are the proficiencies of existing team members.
178.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Is this true? There are plenty of NATO systems that seem to be dual homed and accessible from internet either through port forwarding or VPN. That’s not “physical separation”.
179.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
> If you think running servers is difficult and expensive (you're right), ask yourself why you feel entitled for us to run them for your product. I don't get Moxie's stance. Aren't they running Signal as a public serv
180.
▲
by
aj3
5y ago
Honestly, this attitude (dismissing the feature even without trying it out) comes across as insecurity and gatekeeping.
More ›