ailef

36 ms·

211.
by ailef 5y ago
> it isn't impossible that there are some Actually, it's pretty evident that there are many. They surely still are a minority across the whole population, but they are definitely a strong one at that. The unit you're refer
212.
by ailef 5y ago
And even before that, in 2008, at the Bucharest NATO meeting there were talks about including Georgia and Ukraine into NATO.
213.
by ailef 5y ago
> But it wasn't a NATO intervention Please tell me how I should take your comment seriously. Every reliable source in the world agrees on defining it a "NATO intervention". This is not even debatable and it is exactly the
214.
by ailef 5y ago
And even arguing that it is justified is hard when the United Nations explicitly stated that the intervention was not.
215.
by ailef 5y ago
What's your point? The claim that NATO cannot attack Russia is often justified by the fact that "NATO is a defensive alliance". Previous events show that actions by NATO in the recent past do not reflect this definition, so t
216.
by ailef 5y ago
I was contesting the definition of NATO being a "purely defensive alliance", as is often described also here on HN. For example, NATO intervention in Serbia can hardly considered defensive.
217.
by ailef 5y ago
> Either we agree that countries have sovereignty and can enter whatever pacts they so please or we do not. I completely agree. The problem is that for the past 70 years or more, this has not been like the US has behaved. They set the hi
218.
by ailef 5y ago
Yes, if we only consider definitions and ignore NATO actions for the past 50 years.
219.
by ailef 5y ago
That's why you can't have a reasonable conversation about this topic. If you dare bring forth an alternative view, or just a different view, which doesn't align with US/Western interests, you immediately get called a &qu
220.
by ailef 5y ago
I don't think the parent wanted to justify the invasion or blame it completely on the US. I myself despise the invasion, but the responsibility that the US bears on this conflict cannot be underestimated, and it is totally absent (or a
221.
by ailef 5y ago
> Well, for one the US did not attack Cuba... Please, go read an history book.
222.
by ailef 5y ago
For what it's worth, I'm even younger but completely agree with GP. I now only use Discord for voice with two or three friends in a specific "channel" (or is it room?) but even then I would gladly use Teamspeak instead i
223.
by ailef 5y ago
That page is what I would definitely not characterize as a proper source. From the page itself: > Any attempt to estimate a total number of killings under communist regimes depends greatly on definitions, and the idea to group together d
224.
by ailef 5y ago
All of this applies to Instagram, FB, etc... too? Also > How much are the CCP paying you to defend TikTok in all these comments? This is surely not the way to have a rational conversation about the topic?
225.
by ailef 5y ago
You can always use a stable coin to avoid that risk (I mean, not even that is 100% risk-free but surely orders of magnitude less risky than alternatives).
226.
by ailef 5y ago
You can prompt GPT-3 in ways that make it perform various tasks such as text classification, information extraction, etc... Basically you can force that "meaningless prose" into answers to your questions. You can use this instead
227.
by ailef 5y ago
I'd be interested in reading about some of these real cases if you have any links handy.
228.
by ailef 5y ago
I'm not a lawyer, but I suppose it will apply in the same way GDPR applies to anyone who wants to access the EU market (regardless of where you/your servers are). That is, if you're fine with your system not being accessible
229.
by ailef 5y ago
I guess this is sarcastic?
230.
by ailef 5y ago
There's no assumption in what I wrote, that's just a question. Meanwhile, GP is explicitly putting words in my mouth, but I guess it's ok because my comment was just whataboutism, right?
231.
by ailef 5y ago
Can you point out where I justified the actions of these criminal organizations (as parent said)? It's funny that the comment labeling mine as whataboutism is factually incorrect about what I said. It's easy to reply by labeling a
232.
by ailef 5y ago
You have misunderstood what we're talking about. Nobody is justifying anything, I'm just saying that if it's wrong to give these people a platform, why is it ok to give it to oil companies? The latter have caused way more dam
233.
by ailef 5y ago
That's of course a possible interpretation if you want to stretch everything to the extreme. OP thinks it's dangerous to publish a blog post with such an interview because it gives a platform to people who cause damage. I'm j
234.
by ailef 5y ago
> Let’s put a stop to oil industry before we deal with the kidnappers and killers!! Nobody said there has to be a priority. Why can't we stop both? Moreover OP comments was not talking about stopping them, but about giving these peo
235.
by ailef 5y ago
Considering the huge environmental damage created by e.g. oil companies (and many others), one could say the same about them? The only difference is what these people do is illegal while what the companies do is not: the damage, though, is
236.
Show HN: A user-contributed collection of GPT prompts(gptprompts.org)
3 points by ailef 5y ago|1 comments
237.
by ailef 5y ago
Hi HN! I've been experimenting with GPT-* (GPT-J and GPT-3) for a while and find it really amazing. Since the way you prompt the model is crucial, I thought it would be useful to have a centralized collection of prompts. Most of the on
238.
by ailef 5y ago
Is it actually possible to borrow for so many times without ever returning it back or is this an hyperbole?
239.
by ailef 5y ago
Thanks for tip. I didn't know about this, I will look into it soon!
240.
Show HN: I'm building a crypto trading bot that you can follow live on Telegram
6 points by ailef 5y ago|2 comments

More ›