ahahahahah

12 ms·

91.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
[9,8] -> [6,3,8] -> [6,2,1,8] -> [6,2,9] -> [8,9]
92.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
higher sounds like a quality argument, which may be true. they are not stricter though, which is what they'd need to be to refute the parents point. take headlights, for example, where the us's requirements are significantly stric
93.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
I love how you just continue the lie. I linked to the changelog. Feel free to quote from there where "they communicated it via changelog". That's not even getting into how it's a shitty argument anyway, especially with a
94.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Yes, that is an example of what parent said exists.
95.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
> Promoting great replacement theory is very different than vocal Republican They used to be very different. Today, not so much.
96.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
> I'm also big fan of not dictating what other people should say I'm trying to understand this in the context of musk's behavior, did you mean "I'm also a big fan of saying that I'm a big fan of not dictatin
97.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
What a weird comment. Yes, the article is mostly talking about how this is a trend that's been building over the last 25 years or so. Most of the specific research it cites is from pre 2020. It's like you are arguing against some
98.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
No, it's incredibly irresponsible to hand over the repo to someone else to manage, even someone who is an active contributor. See https://boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-about-the-xz-backdo... for example.
99.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
It's not even that, they didn't misrepresent what it did.
100.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
They've had it for years, it was just opt-in. More recently they've applied it to everything.
101.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
This article has nothing to do with onavo.
102.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
> Some things are so obviously true that only a team of academics could convince themselves otherwise. Ah, yes. I feel it must be so, so no need for evidence and of course any evidence that exists otherwise must be false.
103.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Yeah I agree, data scientists are some of the most naive or immoral people I've worked with. It's unfortunate that the occupation has built a culture of not giving a shit about privacy, security, etc.
104.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
> My understanding: Maybe take a step back and consider where your understanding is sourced from. I don't think I'd take the claims or ravings of a suicidal person as completely true representations of facts you need to account
105.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
How is that experience relevant? Students aren't taking the test remotely, they are taking it in a controlled test center, just possibly with their own device.
106.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Cars for 15-20 years have had good automatic wipers, they're just becoming more widely available now (and evs are generally in the price range where it's expected). Well... except for Tesla. They decided that a person can tell whe
107.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
They've actually open sourced almost everything you need. It includes the cli, the virtual filesystem, and the backend. From github: Sapling SCM is comprised of three main components: The Sapling client: The client-side sl command line
108.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Yeah, sorry this is title about steering failures. Try again.
109.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
They also got approval for another $50b in buybacks. They're just using multiple avenues of getting money back to investors.
110.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Which of my points do either of those refute? The suddenly one certainly not. And the other? That the company itself projected hitting almost all the milestones in just a couple years? Not that one either.
111.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Yeah, it sure wasn't obvious from the very first thing on the page where it says the letter started with "Garry Tan was right", I'm surprised you were able to figure it out after just a few minutes.
112.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Wtf do you mean "suddenly"? The lawsuit was filed almost immediately after the pay package was approved. Also wtf do you mean everyone believed? The company's own plan has then easily hitting like 80% of the goals in just two
113.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Companies must respect the rights of all owners. Those companies are entirely free to limit ownership to only those who are willing to invest the equivalent of 10000 Tesla shares if they want (Berkshire Hathaway, for example, does this). Te
114.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Wtf are you on? This case wasn't about solar city. And SolarCity was acquired 2 years before the pay package was in place anyway. Also, Tesla won the case about SolarCity. Is your objection that they shouldn't have? Because that s
115.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
A base Model 3 is $39,000. Also, you should be using 2012 dollars, not 2008 dollars. A forward looking statement like "I'll do X for less than $Y dollars next year" should already be accounting for inflation in that $Y.
116.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
That's clearly not the problem here. Most EV makers can estimate range just fine, it's almost only Tesla that lies so much about it.
117.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Except that there is no trip where 310 would be the real estimate for that trip. So how is it in any way useful? Tesla just takes the real range, multiplies by some made up factor and pretends that's your range.
118.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Sounds like a terrible board as well. Not surprised to see Andreesen amongst them.
119.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
> I am not sure how some of the things shown are different from any other car. Did you actually watch the hour long source video that was linked to ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxpv3X53WN0 )? There's a ton of exa
120.
by ahahahahah 3y ago
Interesting, how many of the 100s of newspapers in the EU that are doing exactly the same thing as Facebook has he dragged into court for doing it? They've been doing it for a lot longer. I do see some cases against Conde Nast, but tha

More ›