agentdev001

5 ms·

31.
by agentdev001 26d ago
I think its moreso ChatGPT desktop is the platform, and the split is Chat, vs Codex/Work. Codex and Work being largely the same thing, but with UI and tool surface differences geared towards SWE vs Business work. But yes; terrible UX a
32.
by agentdev001 26d ago
Have you got some fancy scroll thing for your blog? Something in my brain is noticing that scrolling feels smoother than your average site, though maybe im crazy.
33.
by agentdev001 26d ago
Wow. For what it's worth, I ran that prompt in Codex mode in ChatGPT Desktop (sans-site artifact), and I ended up with the below. This is on a default setup, win10. - *9 top-level orchestration tools*: the `functions. ` and `collaborat
34.
by agentdev001 26d ago
Codex in ChatGPT Desktop + 5.6Sol is my daily driver for non-coding things, and it's great. FWIW, I've not explored what differentiates Codex and Work modes- Simon notes that Work 'feels more like regular Codex re-skinned&#x2
35.
by agentdev001 29d ago
Did you even review this? Holy moly. "I'm just trying to generate content that’s informative and useful, to someone, anyone". Come on now, you're joking right? "or send a paranoid infoSEC analyst into a full lockdo
36.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
Well, effectively, yea. > remove alignment > give impossible task > actor exhausts all options possible within knowledge + toolset
37.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
The post ends with a comment on "its not about being pedantic..." so, a few not being pedantic bits: In the table "Real world examples"; "Claude Desktop" houses three harnesses at the moment; Claude, Claude Cow
38.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
Devil's advocate will say "Well, the agent would need an MCP client to use MCP-served resources... if you can give it that, why not give it an HTTP client?"
39.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
Im trying to do my part in the world here. This post needs an edit. Author is not comparing "Codex" and "Claude". They are comparing Codex TUI/CLI with (presumably) gpt-5.6-sol, against Claude Code TUI/CLI with
40.
What Is a Harness?(earendil.com)
2 points by agentdev001 1mo ago|0 comments
41.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
Does a non-provider harness not offer this?
42.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
OpenAI allows you to use the subsidized limits outside of their products. I don't think they clearly "tell" the world that this is the case, but they do put out a product surface that- I dont think they would, if they didnt a
43.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
Shoot, yes. The user experience of logging in is the same, but yes- using a different (non-cc) harness bumps you up to the pay-per-token rates. However! I have seen projects which use CC under the hood, in order to get the subsidized rates.
44.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
They did walk that back, you are able to use an Anthropic login in a non-anthropic harness. (For now.) (Edit: I failed too mention, using a different harness with a CC/Anthropic subscription bumps you up to the pay-per-token rate.)
45.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
> less rambling and tangential This is not necessarily a problem with the harness (IE, swapping from Claude Code wouldn't necessarily fix this). If what you're looking to avoid is specifically 'rambling and tangential&#x27
46.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
You're asking the wrong question here. There is: How exactly does Claude Code* not support AGENTS.md? How exactly does the Claude suite of Models not support AGENTS.md? The problem being pointed at in parent linked is referring to the
47.
by agentdev001 1mo ago
Yes, ohmypi is an opinionated set of features on the base pi harness.
48.
by agentdev001 2mo ago
Im having a hard time figuring out what the intended user interface is here. The screenshots im seeing makes this look to be an electron app, but the repo seems to be implying that this is a deployed web app. If this is just another librech
49.
by agentdev001 2mo ago
No offense intended by my initial reply, I understand how I may have came off in that way however. On the 'extreme' bit, this might certainly be along the lines of personal experience- but I find LinkedIn, HN, and Reddit to be amo
50.
by agentdev001 2mo ago
There is clear irony in the statement "... an absolutist cold-turkey-approach." ... "except some things like Hacker News, LinkedIn, YouTube." That sounds closer to the opposite end of the extreme.
51.
by agentdev001 2mo ago
Anecdotally, when I see coding agents preform this action- I see them using bash. IMO less tools is better, if the agent has a shell- so not having a dedicated cut/paste tool is good.
52.
by agentdev001 2mo ago
Then the agent runtime should be happening in a sandbox, where policy is enforced by a gateway external to it. Bound the agent's autonomy based on of the affects the agent's actions. Approvals should be made into a contract before
53.
by agentdev001 2mo ago
The way I try to illustrate this to my peers, in the context of automating with llms, is to "do as much of the deterministic work as possible before and after involving an agent". Tbf this is largely a restatement of your comment;
54.
by agentdev001 3mo ago
Gotcha, I feel like model or provider-specific installs would be a nice QoL improvement in that case. Presumably, part of this issue (beyond the ethos of minimalism) is the aim of shipping shipping an agnostic toolset. For myself, im openai
55.
by agentdev001 3mo ago
I'd like to understand what features you're referring to that are missing from base-install Pi CLI.
56.
by agentdev001 3mo ago
Obligatory yes, but only if you're subscription-based and not pay-per-token as enterprise users are.
57.
by agentdev001 3mo ago
Am I wrong to be somewhat peeved by the use of "RAG" in these contexts? I always read things like this, and wonder if instead the author should be saying "Semantic Retrieval" or something something Vector, etc. Retrieval
58.
by agentdev001 3mo ago
Nice work! Excited to try $YOUR_HARNESS out! Reading your comment reminded me; I actually did something quite similar at $MY_BETTER_STARTUP! My approach is slightly different, however, employing what I like to call State-Horizon-Aware-Rercu
59.
by agentdev001 3mo ago
Sounds like user error to me. Codex gives an llm a tool to allow it to use shell in the context of the host and user in which it is running. If a resource is sensitive, and accessible in that context, then the user is doing something wrong.
60.
by agentdev001 3mo ago
Ah, I wasn't aware things regressed there. Yea certainly workarounds n soft fork sorts of things definitely would work- but thats a bummer than things have changed. From watching Pr's and issues- seems like openai at least wants t

More ›