afro88

8 ms·

61.
by afro88 6mo ago
It doesn't look like they think about how to make it fit though. They just use a known good go template
62.
by afro88 6mo ago
Dude come on, I clearly wasn't saying LLMs are people. My point was it's a tool and it's the responsibility of the person wielding it to check outputs. If it's too hard to check outputs, don't use the tool. Your arg
63.
by afro88 6mo ago
Same as if a regular person did the same. They are responsible for it. If you're using AI, check the code doesn't violate licenses
64.
by afro88 6mo ago
Yep, that is definitely a step change. Pricing is going to be wild until another lab matches it.
65.
by afro88 6mo ago
I use Claude Code extensively and haven't noticed this. But I don't have it doing long running complex work like OP. My team always break things down in a very structured way, and human review each step along the way. It's st
66.
by afro88 6mo ago
IIUC this doesn't make the LLM think in caveman (thinking tokens). It just makes the final output show in caveman.
67.
by afro88 6mo ago
As a kid who spent many hours on Vista on the Amiga 500, this has blown my mind
68.
by afro88 6mo ago
This is a really good idea. Especially if the chunks are marked as read as you are guided through them and you can validate you've seen all the code by the end
69.
by afro88 6mo ago
> The cogs are part of the machine, they don't deserve any sympathy just because they chose to do bad things for money That's a bit of a stretch saying that someone who enforces the rules around disability for a job is doing ba
70.
by afro88 6mo ago
What good does hating the cogs do though? Make noise to the people who can change the machine.
71.
by afro88 7mo ago
Sounds like me with listening to AI covers. After a couple of weeks I couldn't care less. But I was so stoked in it at the start
72.
by afro88 7mo ago
Because AI is way too sycophantic still. The real audio engineers I spoke to said they run into this problem maybe once every few months and even then only when working for particular clients. Too much friction to purchase one offs, not eno
73.
by afro88 7mo ago
I vibe coded a saas and it went nowhere because it wasn't a good enough idea to begin with. I consulted with multiple varied models along the way for competitive analysis, pricing structure etc. AI doesn't solve for ideas and prod
74.
by afro88 7mo ago
That's what I was getting at. With the review and potential rework time, we could be looking at over the original 4 week estimate. So then what's the point in using long running unsupervised agents if it ends up being longer than
75.
by afro88 7mo ago
It's a nice idea, but how do you know the agent is aligned with what it thinks the intent is?
76.
by afro88 7mo ago
Oh I didn't mean literally how do I review code. I meant, if an agent can write a lot of code to achieve a large task that seemingly works (from manual testing), what's the point if we haven't really solved code review? There
77.
by afro88 7mo ago
Good idea, and an improvement, but you still have that fundamental issue: you don't really know what code has been written. You don't know the refactors are right, in alignment with existing patterns etc.
78.
by afro88 7mo ago
I guess to reach this point you have already decided you don't care what the code looks like. Something I'm starting to struggle with is when agents can now do longer and more complex tasks, how do you review all the code? Last we
79.
by afro88 7mo ago
Will you get rid of him? It sounds like he's wasting a lot of your time
80.
by afro88 7mo ago
I wouldn't have picked this article as AI until I got an agent to do some writing for me and read a bunch of it to figure out if I can stand behind it. Now I see the tells everywhere "It's not this. It's that." is p
81.
by afro88 7mo ago
This is exactly right IMO. I have never worked for a company where the bottleneck was "we've run out of things to do". That said, plenty of companies run out of actual software engineering work when their product isn't c
82.
by afro88 7mo ago
Nice setup, but GP said: > how people who really try to learn with these tools work This setup is potentially effective sure, but you're not learning in the sense that GP meant. For GP: Personally I've reached the conclusion th
83.
by afro88 7mo ago
Sometimes people are actually holding it wrong though
84.
by afro88 7mo ago
Honestly, comments are just half the problem. At least half the articles I read from HN are vibe written. And I only spot it after reading a few paragraphs. It's leaving a bad taste, and it's sad because HN was guaranteed to have
85.
by afro88 7mo ago
What models and inference provider?
86.
by afro88 8mo ago
I would have agreed with you a year ago
87.
by afro88 8mo ago
This is what I'm interested in knowing. Just how much can it modify if it's a static binary? Can it modify it's own agents.md etc?
88.
by afro88 8mo ago
Aside from security and efficiency, is there anything openclaw and do that moltis can't? Like for example, does moltis have the "heartbeat" thing, short and long term memory, can update a soul.md etc? I'm so keen to try
89.
by afro88 8mo ago
Man, you have to read the article, not just the headline
90.
by afro88 8mo ago
Right, prompting for depth of field will never work (with current models) because it treats it as a style rather than knowing on some level how light and lenses behave. The model needs to know this, and then we can prompt it with the lens a

More ›