Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
afavour
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
https://xcancel.com/nikitabier/status/2085105586966827343#m The most consequential change in recent years has been to pay users for posting controversial content. For me that killed the service. Anything else is s
152.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Again: sourcing? An explanation of how the Chinese Communist Party is able to transfer money to middle of nowhere community activists like those mentioned in the article?
153.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Is there? Do you have sourcing? Who are the well funded actors spending big against data centers?
154.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
No, it was as a comment about the Chinese government, not something inherent in the Chinese race
155.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Some of the reaction to data center build outs has become irrational but frankly I see it as a reflection of the arrogance of the billionaire tech elite. Voters were told: - AI is going to take your jobs - We need to build our data centers
156.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
But WKWebView does handle its own networking. You’re able to implement block lists, just the same as you can via browser plugin, but in this instance networking definitely is handled by WebKit.
157.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Which is why we need strong regulation. People shouldn’t be able to vote with their wallet when other peoples lives are at stake.
158.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
It’s odd how uninteresting a blog post about an AI system is. “We defined code review rules as if they were linter rules and let the AI agent review code” I don’t really need to know a lot more than that. I can already clearly imagine how i
159.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
> You were/are unskilled. You're being ridiculous and trying to bring personal insult into a conversation. I have, numerous times, asserted that I am discussing the state of the industry as a whole. I don't understand why
160.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Data is cheap and fast, CPU time still isn't. I've profiled numerous web sites on slow Android devices and they absolutely crawl when parsing JS and giant JSON blobs required to hydrate a page that's one big React app for no
161.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
> Every time I see this kind of pet project I see whether they are addressing any actual issue of React Then I think you're looking at those projects from the wrong angle. The point the author is making is that React is often used i
162.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
> And this is why it pays to just learn React. It pays you, the developer, yes. It does not benefit the user. > A contact form is not that complex. Correct, my example was not a great one, just the first one that came to mind. Using a
163.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
You're showing your ignorance here. Different frameworks have different ways of working that can lead to better or worse performance on client devices, no matter what Fable spits out for you. You owe it to your users to care.
164.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
I think React is way overused but every time you see a blog post with "replace it with this pet mini project instead" I groan because you know the reaction is going to be "what about X feature", and of course the mini fr
165.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Framework, not language. And framework choice still matters.
166.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Surely the burden of proof here is proving that a 70% headcount reduction doesn’t make a difference.
167.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
In my experience, product. There’s a pervasive view that product is easy, that anyone working in it is a dunderhead who gets in the way of engineers doing the really worthwhile work. In reality, it would just mean they rewrite the softwar
168.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Self driving maybe? I’m happy to be corrected but I think most brands don’t offer the full self driving package Tesla offers.
169.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
I despise Liquid Glass too but for most users there’s a broad feeling of “it fits” vs doesn’t. And apps with Liquid Glass fit today’s iOS.
170.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
No, I’m suggesting that .button.something-else wouldn’t make any sense. You’d just do button.something-else… not that it would really be that useful to do so. And as you say, it’s for semantics so I wouldn’t use .button anyway as it doesn’t
171.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
It’s funny, as someone that’s been using CSS for decades I don’t really know how to respond because the scenario outlined here is not one I recognise. My button would be a <button>, so no, I wouldn’t have a .button class, it’s superfl
172.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Honestly I tire of this debate. Both sides have good points have both choices are valid. I don’t particularly like Tailwind because I know and like CSS. It’s powerful, Tailwild stands in the way of me doing what I want with it. But in this
173.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Google’s inane push to shove AI into every product is going to cause real harm here. I can’t even fathom what the legitimate use case for this would be.
174.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Sports gambling in the UK has been legal for a long time. I remember as a kid the bookies (shops where you had to go to make a bet) weren’t allowed any exterior windows and all looked absolutely grim. It was an appropriate barrier to have t
175.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
I actually think the CONCACAF statement shows that they could be on board… they’re just mad they weren’t consulted. Give them the cut they want and they might change their tune. By comparison UEFA sounds a lot stronger.
176.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
> It seems unreasonable to expect a system that you say isn't human, which I don't disagree with, to behave "better" than the thing you say it isn't. Why? Excel is better at large data math than a human is. Why c
177.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
An LLM isn't human. I don't really understand this thread of "humans do it so of course an AI does". These are things we ourselves are engineering in a way we cannot do with a human being. Why is it not reasonable to exp
178.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
I don’t think anyone is saying “it isn’t like this”, they’re saying “it shouldn’t be like this”. If I don’t give explicit permission to lie it shouldn’t lie. It’s not a difficult concept!
179.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
And really, it has to be. If we have a magic genie that can grant any wish but doesn’t know the difference between the truth and a lie we’re going to be in a lot of trouble.
180.
▲
by
afavour
2mo ago
Destined to fail, yeah. Just not destined to lie. “Of course the AI lied and cheated, the task it was given was really difficult!” is not a world I want to live in.
More ›