Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aeturnum
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
121.
▲
by
aeturnum
1y ago
I guess if you wanted to argue that the fact that it doesn't say much should not be mistaken for being able to pick and choose your understanding, you should have said that before. Instead you contradicted "The Bible has very litt
122.
▲
by
aeturnum
1y ago
One should not practice these things in actual high security areas, but it can be fun to simply walk around a strange place with a look of purpose and velocity. Not making eye contact, perhaps on a phone. As long as you won't get in tr
123.
▲
by
aeturnum
1y ago
Did you read these? I think they actually go against what you argue. One of the passages about "hell" is John 3:16, which could not be less about hell if it tried (IMO). Also the passages that actually mention hell/hades are
124.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Well, it totally gives up memory mutation. Each value is final (under the hood). So you lose an entire category of optimizations and an entire category of errors. You also gain some new optimizations you can do because values never change.
125.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
You're thinking about JavaScript but I am talking about Node, which fundamentally uses a single-threaded approach[1] to great effect. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17959663/why-is-node-js-...
126.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
IMO it's more that there is value...but the chance that any random developer (i.e. me) is going to be able to realize it is much lower. Your instincts about how do to things will be predictably wrong in this new, different paradigm. Yo
127.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Like, if you decide to do your backend in rust or python you can choose async or synchronous approaches - but Node locks you into async. I'm not a node developer so I can't sing the praises of what you get, but being locked into J
128.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Absolutely! I work in Elixir and I feel very good about its tradeoffs - and a lot of being good with the tool is knowing when to not use it. This tech is very much out of my wheelhouse but it seems very cool and I hope y'all find a nic
129.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
SpacetimeDB fits into a genre of tech that I want to call "universe brain reorgs" - structural re-arrangements that might unlock wild performance increases. The challenge with these is that they require devs to re-align their thin
130.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Yah - they just announced they are ceasing to maintain their "watch together" feature, which I love and use often. I get that they are a small company and must focus their attention but their priorities do not feel like those of a
131.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Plex is in a tough spot. Their main market is likely people who have large libraries of copyright-infringing media, but they can't officially acknowledge that. They want to get revenue somehow to fund the development. My guess is that
132.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I think the case for using hydrogen today is pretty weak, but a lot of the details for why it's a bad choice are (as you say) exacerbated by the one-off deploys of the technology. If you were testing gas busses and needed to truck gaso
133.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
> Languages that allow for a structurally similar codebase offer a significant boon for anyone making code changes because we can easily port changes between the two codebases. From this I can understand why they did not go with, say,
134.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Being able to have a machine double check your work for problems that you fix or dismiss as false seems great? If the bad part is "AI knows best" - I agree with that! Properly deployed, this would be another tool in line with peer
135.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I think you're envisioning this in a pessimistic way. I totally agree that the end conclusion "this statement is fallacious" is pretty useless. But I assume that a working process would also yield the chain of judgements (A i
136.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
This is a really insightful breakdown of dynamics I recognize from places I've worked. I think the "actions" section is a little....slanted towards one way of managing people but it feels like it comes from an experienced pla
137.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I am not an expert but my impression is semaglutide has been in development since the 90s and in use as a drug for about a decade for people with diabetes. The drug and mechanism are old, the use is new. I do not agree that people who don&#
138.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I don't think anyone is suggesting it should be over the counter? Of course a doctor should monitor you while you are on it. We shouldn't give it to people who would use it to deepen a mental health diagnosis. Those concerns have
139.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
> Yes well your PCP / pharmacist should not have prescribed you an appetite suppressant when you have below average body fat %. Why do you think this? I agree that people who have associated risk factors should be prioritized, but
140.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Oh! Well sure SSRIs are over-prescribed and shouldn't be a "front line" treatment. I agree with that. That, to me, is a very different question. What we call "depression" seems to be a complex bundle of brain mess.
141.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
> The problem with SSRIs [...] Yah, serotonin is involved in a lot! I don't think that's a problem? You aren't saying it directly, but I feel like you are pointing to SSRI side effects as if they invalidate that SSRIs he
142.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Exactly this - SSRI's efficacy was established based on improvements in reports from depressed people and we formed a theory about the mechanism based on the interactions we understood. As we try to prove that theory out it turns out o
143.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Oh! I am the asshole here. I was relying on the quote in the thread but you are right that the full license is far too broad! > when an entity wants to do with your input only what you implicitly tell it to do (send a search query to Go
144.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I don't know that I agree I guess? I think when they say they have the right to "make copies of, retain, transmit, reformat, display, and distribute via communication tools Your Content on the Services" - that basically descr
145.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
So to take your example: So based on this request: "Hey, here are my car keys - can you move my car to a different parking space?" The parking attendant's gonna drive it like they do in Ferris Bueller's Day Off[1]. Oh -
146.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Carbon capture is certainly more expensive than renewables but this headline presents a false dichotomy. The question isn't if we capture carbon instead of switching to renewables - that ship sailed long ago - the question is if we nee
147.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I think a lot of the power and capability of LLMs comes from their understanding of a lot of implicit context in language. But generally LLMs will have a dominant understanding of each linguistic construct and if that understanding is isn&#
148.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
Event organization has been fractured for some time. Folks in my area have been using Partiful[1]. Bash[2] (now theBash) used to be in this space a bit but they left. Facebook has even added the ability for people without facebook to attend
149.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I believe it's still the case that the system where TSA swabs things and puts those swabs into a detector uses live bees in cartridges to sense explosives[1] [1] https://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/new-device-uses-
150.
▲
by
aeturnum
2y ago
I think that depends on what you say to the investors!
More ›