Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aes256
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
151.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
Twitter want vertical integration. They're not quite sure what they can do with it, but they know any hope of monetization is lost if all they are doing is providing a backend for third party clients.
152.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
The business model is broken, the monetization prospects aren't there, and ultimately, Twitter is a fad.
153.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
The IPS are predisposed to support the underdog in any conflict, and yes, the BBC are widely regarded as having a pro-Palestinian bias. As for the Electronic Intifada, which you previously cited. I think you can work that one out for yourse
154.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
Is there a humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip? No. Israel provides the residents of the Strip with food, water, electricity, medical supplies, etc. The residents respond with rockets aimed at Israeli civilians.
155.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> Because the attitude of Israel hasn't changed An utterly preposterous generalization. > The UN and the BBC disagree with you on the blockade No they don't. You referred to an 'aid blockade'. Legitimate aid flows freely into the Ga
156.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> Er, what? Go and look up the history of Irgun and Lehi. What do the actions of dissidents 70 years ago have to do with classifying current Israeli government policy as rather humane? You could spend the rest of your life investigating
157.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
'Anonymous' is a movement, not simply a label for anyone who is not easily identifiable. The movement has a distinct ethos and a set of guiding principles. When I say the script kiddies conducting these particular attacks are 'not Anonymous
158.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> Food, medicine and water is blockaded? sure. Go on a mass hunger strike. Let the world know about it, inform them about your suffering. Food, medicine and water are not blockaded? Israel allows enormous amounts of aid to pass into the
159.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
The comments about how easy it is to avoid targets are in response to those making farcical claims about the density population of the Gaza Strip, and suggesting it is impossible for civilians to escape the conflict. Israel are engaged in a
160.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> sorry, but when you look at civilian death rate and compare both sides the story is very different. whatever measures the IDF claims it is taking, it clearly isn't working. In what sense is it not working? According to the latest figu
161.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
The effectiveness of using civilians as human shields does not justify the practice.
162.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
This isn't carpet-bombing. Israel are only engaging in pinpoint strikes on legitimate military targets. Where should citizens run? Around 100m away from any rocket manufacturing, storage or launch site should be sufficient. That means most
163.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> If it's not so hard to civilians to avoid these areas, then why is it inevitable that they be caught in the crossfire? Nothing is perfect. Equipment malfunctions, mistaken intel, and human error can all lead to civilian casualties, de
164.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
It's a large-scale armed conflict. Civilians are going to get caught in the crossfire. Alas, it's a strange sort of conflict in which one side deliberately targets civilians, while the other does everything humanly possible to avoid them.
165.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
There are both dense and sparsely populated areas of the Strip. Israel are not carpet-bombing the area, they are performing pinpoint strikes on legitimate military targets. As a civilian, it is not difficult to avoid those targets.
166.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
Heavy bombing of densely populated areas? It's rather simple. As a general rule, civilians in the Gaza Strip know if they are near a target. You don't live next to a rocket manufacturing, storage or launch site without knowing about it. The
167.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
1) These script kiddies are not Anonymous; 2) The majority of the sites affected appear to be hosted with a single company; 3) If any of the deleted databases held important information, there will be backups. Edit: 4) The leaked passwords
168.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> So if you stopped people unsubscribing $5.8 billion more would be spent on retail? No, people have, roughly, a fixed amount to spend, stopping them unsubscribing isn't going to give them more money. Yep. One retailer's loss is another
169.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
Secretaries of State are not intended to be authorities on their respective subjects. The decisions they make are typically completely abstracted from any technical matters, and they have a wide range of expert opinion to call upon when nec
170.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
Most frustrating thing in the world. My AppleID password is pretty secure (~25 characters, upper/lower case, alphanumeric, bunch of symbols, etc.) and having to type it in on an iPhone/iPad every time I want to download an app (even a free
171.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
These comments summarize my thoughts rather eloquently. Clicked through to the article expecting something interesting, left almost immediately upon realizing it was just Mat Honan milking his hacking once again .
172.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> How many companies out there are widely successful? Obviously most companies mix successes and failures, but in recent years Sony has been pushing out an unreasonable number of failures with no successes to show for it. I don't see an
173.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
We have corporation tax as well as income tax for a reason. I'm no accountant or tax lawyer, but it's obvious Google are playing games with the UK. According to their own filings, they made $4bn from UK sales in the last financial year. The
174.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> Contentious - damage, or consumer choice and therefore progress? It's a matter of whether there is a level playing field. I was shocked to hear the representative from Amazon admit yesterday that they only pay 3% tax on ebook sales th
175.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> As for Google I feel it is less of a problem. They mainly deal in digital goods. They don't have a big presence in the UK. They just offer their online service's here. I don't buy this. It's absurd that a UK business can pay to place
176.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
There is still no (to my knowledge) killer NAS setup for music. Everything is slow, or messy, or has a crap interface. Sometimes all three. Then you take your laptop out of your house and you don't have access to any of your music.
177.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
With combined capacity and transfer rates (via USB 3.0) like these, I don't see any reason not to store games on a flash drive like this. Why would someone? A lot of people are now using SSDs as their system drives. Given the cost of SSDs,
178.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
It's easy to fill up huge amounts of space with entirely legal content, as others here have pointed out. Photos, home movies, VMware images, iTunes downloads, large datasets, etc. all take up huge amounts of space.
179.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
> Decisions seem to be based on public pressure or context. That in itself is quite alarming, that the justice system seems to be bowing to the whim of the mob. More worrying is that, in each of these cases, there were people who initia
180.
▲
by
aes256
14y ago
There have been a number of troubling free speech cases in the UK over the last few months. In July, a 17-year-old was arrested during the Olympics for tweeting abusive messages at diver Tom Daley. In August, a 22-year-old man was arrested
More ›