aendruk

75 ms·

1. 1021.▲
   by aendruk 12y ago

   I don't understand—why would you want to be secretive about running a relay? Especially if you're running an exit relay, I'd expect that you'd be best off doing it in the open so that others can correctly interpret the b
2. 1022.▲
   by aendruk 12y ago

   Their background image is successfully reproducing the nauseating effects of this monitor test [1]. I can't look at it for long without experiencing physical discomfort. Perhaps disabling it is part of the game. [1]: http://
3. 1023.▲
   by aendruk 13y ago

   It's an open letter; he's writing for us, not the recruiter. The recruiter merely serves as a prompt.
4. 1024.▲
   by aendruk 13y ago

   I had success in asking LinkedIn to blacklist my email address [1]. My reasoning behind the decision was simply that I found their continual attempts to socially manipulate me insulting, and that I'd prefer not to be walked all over by
5. 1025.▲
   Brackets 0.38 Release (Multiple cursors)(blog.brackets.io)

   6 points by aendruk 13y ago|0 comments
6. 1026.▲
   by aendruk 13y ago

   Please forgive my naivety—why are mailing lists forging from addresses in the first place? Have they just been fragilely dependent for years on the exploitation of an authentication vulnerability?
7. 1027.▲
   by aendruk 13y ago

   It's a shame that this is proprietary and hosted—as good as nonexistent in the discussion of general-purpose tools.
8. 1028.▲
   Tor mirror in the DNS?(lists.torproject.org)

   2 points by aendruk 13y ago|0 comments
9. 1029.▲
   Quilt plots. Like heat maps, only…heat maps(nsaunders.wordpress.com)

   1 points by aendruk 13y ago|0 comments
10. 1030.▲
    by aendruk 13y ago

    I've done some more tests [1] as you suggested. It looks like Shaw is routing all UDP/53 traffic to their DNS servers; I'd not considered TCP earlier. My optimistic guess as to their motivation for using such an invasive tech
11. 1031.▲
    by aendruk 13y ago

    Thanks for the explanation. Would you interpret these results as supporting evidence of my claim? $ dig +short chaos txt version.bind @31.13.75.17 "PowerDNS Recursor 3.5.3 $Id$" This happens despite having opted out
12. 1032.▲
    by aendruk 13y ago

    It doesn't matter what DNS servers I specify; Shaw intercepts all DNS requests. I can even make up a nonexistent DNS server as long as it's internet-routable, and will get a valid response from Shaw. This works, for example: d
13. 1033.▲
    by aendruk 13y ago

    My ISP [1] actually does this. They offer an opt-out of NXDOMAIN hijacking, but silently proxy all port 53 traffic regardless. This experience has taught me simply to distrust the DNS protocol in its current form and use DNSCrypt in all sit
14. 1034.▲
    Fighting the "War on Ignorance"(randall.executiv.es)

    1 points by aendruk 13y ago|0 comments
15. 1035.▲
    by aendruk 13y ago

    It may be qualifying "she's on her ass" as inappropriate.
16. 1036.▲
    by aendruk 13y ago

    I've chosen to extend[1] that definition to: Quora. (n). A site that used to appear in my search results. [1]: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/personal-blocklist...
17. 1037.▲
    by aendruk 13y ago

    The Facebook app is a tricky example, as it's the only piece of software capable of generating two-step authentication tokens for Facebook. I've wondered for a while whether that was done as a strategic move specifically to pressure the "cl
18. 1038.▲
    by aendruk 14y ago

    This wouldn't have happened if the original submission had followed the site guidelines[1]: > If you want to add initial commentary on the link, write a blog post about it and submit that instead. I view it as similar to Wikipedia's "no
19. 1039.▲
    by aendruk 14y ago

    54:33