adsfqwop

13 ms·

61.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Good attitude, however I'm sorry I'm going to have to invoke a little bit of cognitive pain for you :-/, and point out that your base assumption is that the FDA and CDC are benevolent, fully competent, and always operating in
62.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Does he know Glyphosate mimics glycine? I'm pretty sure he doesn't. That's an unknown to him. Whenever you study a complex subject, you have to be aware that there are things you might not know about. And there are also thing
63.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
You fail to account for the possibility of unknown unknowns, and again you're displaying biased cognitive dissonance. You can't determine generational toxicity from LD50 profiles. You are simplifying everything way too much. Glyph
64.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Did you read the article? The court documents included Monsanto’s internal emails and email traffic between the company and federal regulators. The records suggested that Monsanto had ghostwritten research that was later attributed to acad
65.
How Soil Microbes and Intercellular Communication Affects Human Health(articles.mercola.com)
1 points by adsfqwop 10y ago|1 comments
66.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
While I am a firm believer in logic reasoning, we also have to realize its shortcomings. The shortcomings stem from the fact that it is our brain that is used to draw the inferences and causal chains that lead to our logical conclusions. Th
67.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
You could start with something like Paul Craig Roberts, Global Research, Carl Denninger, Bill Still, ZeroHedge, The Corbett Report, Rice Farmer. I use many other ones, but those should be decent entry points to find your own preferred sourc
68.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Alex Jones is often the person to trot out when you want to discredit the alternative news media. What you then get is exactly the reaction you just got, which is aggressive push-back and a desire to never research the topic yourself. Becau
69.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Whenever I google a problem with a microsoft product, and the search ends up on one of these answer.microsoft.com pages, I always click on the link with an enormous feeling of dread. I don't think I've ever seen a usable answer on
70.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
You do understand that there is a vast financial interest in "debunking" scientific findings like this? The first red flag that there are corporate interests behind any "debunking" effort is that an actually serious find
71.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Anthony Samel, a chemist researching glyphosate, has already practically proven this weaving is happening. He is finding glyphosate in everything that has proteins in it. Especially things that contain gelatin, where gelatin is made out of
72.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Never mind that Julian Assange is saying the source was not Russia.
73.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
It's hard to put a straight number on it, other than that "it will most likely reduce the negative effects". A standardized HEPA filter removes 99.97% of particles down to PM0.3. How much it cleans the air in the room in the
74.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Btw. just for curiosity, there is a difference in the source of radiation as it pertains to how dangerous it is. Banana (potassium) radiation is mostly harmless to humans. Nuclear weapon or reactor radiation (for example caesium) is not. Th
75.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Am I? The Nature article explicitly states that the shift in diagnosis criteria does not fully explain the increase in numbers. "Shifting diagnoses and heightened awareness explain only part of the apparent rise in autism. Scientists a
76.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
I don't quite buy that autism will be shown to be genetic. I think it's an environmental factor. The rate of increase in autism is pretty much exponential: http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111102/full
77.
Photographer sneaks into Fukushima exclusion zone(enenews.com)
2 points by adsfqwop 10y ago|0 comments
78.
Scientific publishers are killing research papers(arstechnica.com)
2 points by adsfqwop 10y ago|0 comments
79.
by adsfqwop 10y ago
Study report is here: http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/05/26/055699.f... The results do not seem all that convincing to me, even though the authors seem to be saying that th
80.
Major Cell Phone Radiation Study Reignites Cancer Questions(scientificamerican.com)
5 points by adsfqwop 10y ago|1 comments
81.
by adsfqwop 11y ago
Unfortunately the human factor is exactly the problem with these types of systems. I don't think humans can ever be considered to be safe stewards of anything where a seemingly remote cascade event can wipe out life on the planet. Look
82.
The Veneer of Justice in a Kingdom of Crime; Goldman Sachs, DOJ, Crime Syndicate(youtube.com)
2 points by adsfqwop 11y ago|0 comments