Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
adrianbg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
adrianbg
14y ago
What is knock-off to you? A similar product manufactured for less or an inferior counterfeit indistinguishable from the genuine article by naive consumers? The latter was and is still a genuine problem; what is wrong with learning from othe
122.
▲
Spinning Klein bottle in WebGL; lighting Nd surfaces
(tenfour.ag)
3 points
by
adrianbg
14y ago
|
0 comments
123.
▲
by
adrianbg
14y ago
"Vic Gundotra is a sleazeball" - my Google exit questionnaire. [edit s/My/my/]
124.
▲
by
adrianbg
14y ago
And so, the wall crumbles.
125.
▲
by
adrianbg
15y ago
Actually technology is the best way to solve cultural and political problems. The invention of the printing press solved (or contributed to solving) many such problems, like the tyranny of the catholic church. Technology also had a huge rol
126.
▲
by
adrianbg
15y ago
Pretty harsh considering comex is right and pranjalv123 is wrong. Authentication is still necessary in quantum communication channels. MIM is no less possible on a quantum channel than a classical one. Eavesdropping is harder but the no-clo
127.
▲
by
adrianbg
15y ago
I don't agree. A company can never pay dividends then be bought out by a company that also never pays dividends. I'm thinking now that there are two components to a stock's value: a concrete component, since a share represents a part of the
128.
▲
by
adrianbg
15y ago
I have longstanding confusion on this subject. What if dividends are never paid? To my layman's intuition it seems like a more sensible basis for stock valuation is as a fraction of the value of the entire company. This is only equivalent t
129.
▲
by
adrianbg
15y ago
Do you know who I am?!?
130.
▲
by
adrianbg
15y ago
Oh no, not my comment too! You guys don't like Youtube? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkJXioTetwQ
131.
▲
by
adrianbg
15y ago
Downvote? This is the best comment here.
132.
▲
by
adrianbg
16y ago
The patent system ensures that your description is defensible so that when the time comes to defend it you don't suddenly find out you're screwed.
133.
▲
by
adrianbg
16y ago
Who cares about amendments? Is it moral or not?
134.
▲
by
adrianbg
17y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levinthals_paradox pretty interesting, but it sounds more like the protein folding nature does isn't NP-complete. Like, Scott Aaronson says, nature may just have selected a subset of proteins that it happens t
135.
▲
by
adrianbg
17y ago
I don't think a naive search would even be useful because finding globally minimal energy configurations isn't the goal. It's pretty unlikely that nature would happen to put such large systems as whole proteins in their lowest possible ener
136.
▲
by
adrianbg
17y ago
Especially in the case of pain this makes total sense to me. Pain is just a signal that something is wrong with you. If you believe in some deep way that the problem has been fixed, then there's no reason for your body to keep making you fe