adjkant

100 ms·

901.
by adjkant 9y ago
Not really for an automatic trading algorithm. Write once, use for quite a while. Say a week of work (40 hours) for returns say 1/10th of holding is still quite worth it. Both of those numbers are quite conservative.
902.
by adjkant 9y ago
Depending on the automated strategy, they can dramatically reduce risk though. That has value well beyond the simple return of buy and hold, where if you don't time the sell perfectly, it's all useless. I think that's the big
903.
by adjkant 9y ago
They are. https://outline.com/qMtpFx
904.
by adjkant 9y ago
If I'm not mistaken, Google is partnered with Lyft. https://outline.com/qMtpFx
905.
by adjkant 9y ago
Yeah, good catch, I didn't consider that. But still, what type of algorithm will see such an increase in number of requests during the crash times but not during any others? Based on what I've seen, the number of requests needed t
906.
by adjkant 9y ago
The learning method is really quite naive, I'll put it that way. The algorithm I chose is designed to be risk averse and crash resistant. The learning method and algorithm are orthogonal/separate, and what learning you pair with w
907.
by adjkant 9y ago
Personally, I'm not fully, though I'm sure there are methods. Realistically, right now the naive solution is working just fine, which is just identifying market trends. Because so much is bots, it inherently learns the trends of b
908.
by adjkant 9y ago
The GDAX API has a pretty low rate limit. The bots should be running 24/7, so the "cause" depends on your point of view I guess: if the increased human traffic is what kills the service, or if the existence of the constant bo
909.
by adjkant 9y ago
As someone using machine learning to identify the patterns of bots on GDAX and riding the waves accordingly, I can say this is certainly happening. It's not just one bot though. There is huge money right now in crypto markets, both ill
910.
by adjkant 9y ago
The irony is always present, lol. I use Grammarly for my spellcheck, so I'm amazed that made it through.
911.
by adjkant 9y ago
Autocorrect is a huge feature for most users, myself included. I have bad typing, and it's often much faster than looking something up in the dictionary. For every miscorrect it get's dozens right.
912.
by adjkant 9y ago
There are no fees on GDAX unless you're a taker.
913.
by adjkant 9y ago
Yeah, all of that's fair. I would do the same as you, but my old one was on its last legs. In the end, I spent $150 on adapters and have been good to go on my personal setup since, traveling and at home. I'm sure this is a lot big
914.
by adjkant 9y ago
True, but that worse processor and -2 USB-C ports that I would never use thanks to having to have a hub anyways saves $500. Enough to upgrade the processor to an i7. > Plus it's still a little more expensive than the previous base m
915.
by adjkant 9y ago
Ethereum: - June 13th: $380 - July 17th: $185 - August 31st: $389 - December 16th: $700+ 50% or more swings are all too common. I doubt this is the end. While I would love to see the crash happen sooner than later, I think the percentage of
916.
by adjkant 9y ago
You don't have to get the touch bar, FYI. Most CS people I know opt to go without it and miss pretty much nothing. I agree with the pain of USB-C, but one hub for home and one mobile adapter can solve all that. It's not as bad as
917.
by adjkant 9y ago
The split value is in theory but didn't seem to follow in practice. Anyone can create a fork, and the market will not be that efficient, even in the long run. I don't think the metaphor works for that reason. Simply, forking makes
918.
by adjkant 9y ago
Correct.
919.
by adjkant 9y ago
a6a4e48fc29111570ec4d673056bb770fe7597587c9c2b53a35cc2a6cfb10698 I'll give it a go. Thanks!
920.
by adjkant 9y ago
Why are people downvoting this? What is incorrect here?
921.
by adjkant 9y ago
> I think most people are concerned with making sure they're not actively supporting and organization currently behaving badly (and I pretty strongly believe that Uber isn't) I don't think that's morally right to only
922.
by adjkant 9y ago
You didn't answer the question. Is that life fulfilling? And is it so for most / all of the population?
923.
by adjkant 9y ago
And you think that would be a fulfilling life if it wasn't exploring a new planet and shaping it to the way we want?
924.
by adjkant 9y ago
Future actions do not excuse past ones. A right and a wrong don't cancel out, they both exist. I have noticed small improvements with the introduction of tipping and I'm sure it will get better, but that's not very hard to do
925.
by adjkant 9y ago
The problem with easy replace is what a lot of old phones had - a drop and the battery comes flying out too. Obviously, this has gotten a lot better since then, but I think there is an advantage in design for daily use for not having batter
926.
by adjkant 9y ago
This highlights something incredibly important. There's a very stark age line in people using touch screens by default. I TA an intro CS course, and I've noticed the line creep. It's somewhere between those born in 1998 and 2
927.
by adjkant 9y ago
Do you want to live in a world without any other living things? How many living things do you want? Is life less interesting if there are only two types of living beings? I think that the world as we know it is valuable to us because we enj
928.
by adjkant 9y ago
I disagree that the regular employees are innocent here. You support the company you work for. Most employees there could easily get jobs elsewhere. Sure, they forfeit options, but they stop powering truly one of the worst companies we have
929.
by adjkant 9y ago
Again, technical challenges generally and scale are not the same thing. Also I'm sorry but I don't think those challenges are nearly that hard. ETA's are not that hard to solve, nor am I convinced that they beat Google on ETA
930.
by adjkant 9y ago
Why?

More ›